| All Archives 9/11/01-12/31/02 Five Star Pieces, Quotes, SoundBites, and Columnists from the world press; Crop Circle Diary; Conversation tracks -- plus Monthly Reports and Updates sent to listmembers through 12/31/02
|
|
| The Conversation.org A Mighty Companions ProjectPublisher: Suzanne Taylor Los Angeles, CA, USA
TheConversation.org had its start when 9/11 dictated that we were in a new world. At this threshold moment for humanity, when we must choose wisely to avoid what could be our annihilation, this site is dedicated to tracking the emerging intelligence that we need for our very survival, and to conversation in which that intelligence can be forged.
Let those who see beyond the idea of force imposing world order, to where we look to heal the causes of despair, meet here.
|
|
|
|
My Friend's Miracle on the Mountain Wednesday, December 24, 2008 - 02:27 PM This and That
| This is a holiday heartwarmer. In this piece, that ran in one of our local papers, you'll be so happy to meet my wonderful friend, Doug Heyes. After the small investment of time to read his saga -- which will pull you in once you start, so do start -- you'll have felt you made a friend. I met Doug after his ordeal and was shocked to find out what he'd been through, which you'd never know now. It's a miracle story for a miracle season, and, if you weren't a believer in miracles before, you will be after you read this. It's my gift to you wonderful people who give me the gift of your attention and your appreciation. Enjoy!
Miracle on the Mountain – one Man’s Journey to Thanksgiving By Cassandra Wiseman for the Topanga Messenger – 11/20/08It isn’t for the moment that you are struck that you need courage, but for the long uphill climb back to sanity and faith and security. – Anne Morrow Lindbergh When people talk of miracles in normal conversation, they typically excuse the lack of belief, or skepticism, as a reaction to possibilities that can neither be understood nor explained under the basic tenets of logic and science. There’s the uncertainty about the mystical or the spiritual world that leaves plenty of room for doubt. There’s the concern that what they have experienced will be taken for coincidence, good fortune, a prime example of the chaos theory - or worse - delusion. And there’s the mystery of why one person is chosen to get the experience of divine intervention when others, equally deserving, are left to suffer without deliverance from an all-seeing supposedly benevolent spirit. Yet, even with all these lurking variables, the spiritual believers have as much faith today as ever before. Your normal person, if any of them actually exist, has far greater access to information in this age of internet and technology than men like Albert Einstein did when they spoke of their belief in God. But this access isn’t necessarily taking believers, or non-believers, any closer to knowing the truth. In fact, what may drive people crazy of late is that we know so little. It was a beautiful autumn afternoon in Topanga; the trees were beginning to turn and there were only two white cloud wisps in a bright blue sky when I drove up to interview Doug Heyes. I knew very little about him other than that for the past fifteen years, he has worked voluntarily as a member of the National Ski Patrol at Snow Summit. Eight years ago, while out on patrol, he took a forward launching fall, landed on his head, and sustained a severe spinal cord injury which left him unable to move or feel anything from the neck down. I have to admit that I gave a little start when he came out to meet me. I knew he had somehow overcome his injuries enough to recently finish the MS-150 with his son Adam, a test of endurance for any cyclist - it involves riding 150 miles of rugged Southern California terrain – let alone a man who experienced such a devastating, life-altering injury. Nothing prepared me for the tall, gregarious man who smiled so warmly as he greeted me. I subsequently learned that he is a Southern California native who has lived in Topanga for 26 years, and was privy to the most extraordinary journey of his life that, at long last, he wanted to share publicly. He led me to his office, replete with photographs of physical exploits, many of them taken while running whitewater rapids on the Kern with Adam. There was a photograph on his desk of both of them smiling, their arms wrapped around each other, taken this year on the summit of Mount Whitney, which they climbed together. The walls are adorned with replicas of his personal heroes, among them Albert Einstein, William Shakespeare and Kwan Yin, the female Buddha of compassion. He has the athletic, golden-boy good looks and outdoorsy physicality that you might expect of a TV star. In fact, as a young actor, he guest-starred in many TV episodes, like Police Woman and The Hardy Boys, and in mini-series, like Aspen and Captains and the Kings. He has a Hollywood pedigree that claims three generations of a show-business family. Both of his paternal grandparents were actors: his grandfather, Herbert Heyes, was a star of silent films and later became a character actor, often remembered as Mr. Gimble in the film, Miracle on 34th Street. "My father was a very well-known writer-director named Douglas Heyes," he explains. "We had an amazing relationship and he directed me in my first role on TV, when I was three, in the ‘Dust’ episode of The Twilight Zone. He directed me several more times over the years when I was working as a young actor. Later, after I'd been working as a writer in TV, we collaborated on several scripts together. He died on February 8th, 1993. In a very real sense, my brother and I are shepherds of a generations-long creative legacy–me as a writer-producer, and my brother as the Emmy-winning composer-musician, Mark Heyes." During the ‘90s, Heyes wrote scripts for television shows such as MacGyver, Hunter, The Fall Guy, Silk Stalkings, Walker, Texas Ranger, Farscape, and Pacific Blue. He also wrote and produced an award-winning and critically-acclaimed play, Seven Out, starring Perry King and Priscilla Barnes, which premiered at The Globe Playhouse in 1997. The creative bloodline is flowing to another generation as Heyes collaborates for the first time on a new screenplay with Adam, who works now as a music editor. The two share an extraordinary close relationship–they took classes together and graduated in the same ceremony with degrees in psychology from UCLA. Both plan to pursue advanced degrees in psychology. "I don’t often tell this story," Heyes begins. I’m not quite sure where to start. "This actually happened on Valentines weekend of 2000 around 11 a.m. I was on patrol at Snow Summit and snow was just moving up into the canyon. We had had a light snow, it was mostly cloudy with some little breaks here and there, but the storm was clearly moving in. Whenever the weather permits we make snow at Snow Summit, so we had the snow guns on one of our beginner hills, 8-Face, and it blows out right under our principal quad express chair. I was doing a hill check, just a morning duty of checking out a certain area of the mountain, making sure everything was okay, equipment’s good, chairs are good, everybody’s doing what they should be. "I’ve skied with the snow guns hundreds of times. My hill check took me down through the 8-Face area that morning and, uncharacteristically, I was not wearing my helmet. I always wear my helmet but it was slow, super mellow skiing, just checking things out, and I came down to our main central run called Interlude where we have most of our traffic, and everything just gleamed. I was below the last snow gun on 8-face, making the last turn at Interlude when my skis ran across a berm of snow that was created by the snow guns spewing snow–it was ungroomed and kind of a pile. When my skis ran across that berm, they stopped dead. I blew out of my heel bindings and launched forward. I intended to do a somersault, land on my back and everything would be fine. As it happened, my head hit the ground sooner than I thought it would and with a great deal of force. Instantly, I felt something like a bomb go off in my body–a vibrating gong feeling from the neck down; it was like the Liberty Bell, a resonance beyond anything you could imagine. It was intensely powerful. I became like a rag doll and tumbled two or three times and landed face down, facing up the hill on my stomach in the snow. I was spread-eagle, and realized I was just lying there. My mind was saying, ‘you weren’t going very fast … just get up.’ So I tried to get up and nothing happened from the neck down. I quickly realized I couldn’t breathe, I couldn’t move, I couldn’t feel. From the neck up I could still move and was aware I was still chewing my gum. Things were still working from the neck up," Heyes laughed, "at least as well as they ever do. "At that moment I processed what must have happened and knew that I must have injured my spinal cord at the level where I couldn’t breathe. I looked back up hill for help. I could feel my jaw still chewing, I could lift my head up just a little and knew I was lucky to be alive. But I didn’t know what to do." Heyes shifted in his chair and gave me a reassuring look, like someone does when they are speaking of unsettling things. "I looked back up the hill and saw my father standing there as real as anything–he did not look ethereal, ghostly or otherworldly, not shimmery or transparent. He was wearing the same brown pants and yellow windbreaker that I’d seen him wear a thousand times, as if he had just come out for a walk. I mouthed the words, 'What do I do now?' "’Just breathe,’" he said. "And my eyes looked back down again and I realized at that moment that my chest was beginning to rise and fall and I was starting to breathe. I looked up to say thank you and he was gone. I was breathing but couldn’t move anything, couldn’t key my radio for help so I literally just had to lie there. "I’d fallen directly under a chair lift, and even though it was snowing hard now, I was wearing my red patrol jacket with a big white cross on the back. A fellow patroller riding the chair spotted the cross but he didn’t have his radio on him because he was just free-skiing. He had to ride all the way to the top of the chair to report my wreck. Finally, I heard my radio squawk, ‘Patroller down,’ and my location. Help was on the way. "The first two guys on scene, Josh and Scott, I knew very well. We’re like a family up there, and we all have a real love and respect for one another. Three more patrollers quickly arrived, Eddie, Chuck and Alex. Eddie is a Christian minister. All of these guys who came on scene are top-drawer senior patrollers and first aid instructors, and as it happens, all five of them are devout Christian men, deacons in their churches. At this point I should add that I come from a Christian Scientist background– metaphysics, science. I’ve always had a deep faith and a real personal relationship with a divine power, just not with any particular church. I’ve done a lot of exploration–Western, Eastern–and am a man of genuine faith and service; but when I say I have an eclectic spiritual background, that’s an understatement. "Now we get back into the actual rescue work: there’s a backboard and oxygen and we reach the point in the scenario where they are about to roll me over on my back. Right at this instant the clouds open up and a beam of light shoots out of the sky and illuminates the spot where we are. It was exactly at that moment that all five of these guys went ‘off book,’ put their hands on me and prayed -- that my healing would be a sign of God’s love, compassion and will, and that I would forever be a witness to that. As they prayed, all fear simply left me. I became very clear that this was something extraordinary and was totally aware that something miraculous was taking place, something much larger than me, something in which I was only playing a part. Then they went back "on book" and did everything they needed to do medically to get me down to the hospital. "When they came to fasten my hands across my chest, I said, ‘I feel that,’ and then I could feel it again when they were moving my other arm – not a solid feeling, but a sensation as if through a mattress. I felt this wasn’t happening to me. But I was there. I was used to running my own scenarios. In fact, the guys later laughed that I was ‘running my own wreck,’ directing them as though I was just another patroller attending to the guy on the ground -- except I was now that guy. After they prayed, they finished packaging me into the toboggan and got me down off the mountain. "After the initial MRI at Big Bear Community Hospital, the doctors could see that there was a lot of damage. The attending emergency room doctor described the injury as short of having severed my spinal cord, and was the worst skiing injury he had ever seen. The official diagnosis was a spinal cord contusion with incomplete quadriplegia and deep-cord syndrome. "We have a saying in the ski patrol, ‘C-3-4-5 – lucky to be alive.’ I had a C-3-4-5 and 6. We had to wait seven hours for the storm to clear so that they could airlift me out to Loma Linda. During those seven hours I started to recover very gross movements of the large muscles of my legs. From the moment those patrollers laid their hands on me up on the hill I felt as if I were in a divine state of grace. Sensation began to slowly return, and I started my early recovery clear in my own connection with the divine: that a miracle had taken place and had come through the power of healing prayer. The whole experience was totally life and faith affirming. I was in this extraordinary space – a space that I can only describe as truly inspired, charged. "I spent five or six days in Loma Linda in the critical care unit. My hands wouldn’t work, I had trouble breathing in certain positions and was struggling to deal with not being able to move, or having only very basic gross movement. A lot of people came to visit. I saw them come in with looks of despair and trepidation and then would see them leave totally clear and enlightened, knowing that I would be okay, that something extraordinary was taking place, as I told them this story of the little miracle on the mountain. I saw how it changed them. "I was eventually transferred to Daniel Freeman Hospital in Inglewood, which was another blessing because, at the time, we didn’t know that it just happens to have one of the best spinal cord care centers in the world. It was a Catholic hospital, run by an order of nuns who would come to visit me even though I am not Catholic. Initially, I didn’t want the literature and all that, but I was very moved by their sense of service and faith. It was a great environment and I would go to the chapel to pray. I was still unable to walk, but I could wheel myself out to the garden at Daniel Freeman. I loved it. There was a giant Banyan tree and that’s where I spent a lot of time meditating, praying and talking to God. "In the garden under the Banyan trees I was inspired and almost possessed with the idea of recovering. We did a lot of physical and occupational therapy. When I first got to Daniel Freeman they did a squeeze test with my hands: I was able to get two pounds on my left but my right hand was minus two pounds. I couldn’t walk but I was beginning to have some core movement. Part of my transition was that I was no longer the provider of care and accepting being cared for and to stop apologizing. The task for me was simply putting one foot in front of the other. The first time I could drive my wheelchair I was elated when I blew out a lat muscle and just kept going and going because I’m used to pushing through pain. I was already in a world of pain where my body felt as if it was being roasted alive, or as if fire ants were consuming me." Listening to Doug Heyes talk, I wondered how jarring it must have been for such a physically active, successful, service-oriented man to have somersaulted so suddenly from the known to the unknown. Transitioning from action-hero to – not a victim - but having to depend and rely on other people’s actions to run his life; losing use of his most basic bodily functions; losing control of his life; transitioning, in one heartbeat, from vitality and outdoor adventurer to pain and long days where laboring just to squeeze a soft ball was the goal of the day; the loss of his career: it struck me when he was telling me this story of such great vicissitudes that he did so without a trace of self-pity or regret. He never said to me, "I didn’t want to go on, because it was too hard," or, "I was ready to give up." Sometimes courage and faith show up when you are at your lowest point. But they are there if you choose to find them. I was struck by how much faith and courage Heyes must now have, to understand and want to share how mysterious and profound life is, and not to dismiss, repress, scorn, or rationalize the miracles that were taking place around his recovery. "I had the best possible care from everyone. The staff just radiated love. When people ask me what got you well, I say, ‘Love is what got me through everything. Love is what healed me.’ Love to me is the most powerful force in the Universe. I know that it has been all about love, both receiving and transmitting it. When I say that the most powerful element in my healing was love, I think it’s important to mention that it was Jan (my wife of 32 years), our great love, and her totally selfless dedication to my recovery that helped me heal. "I shared my story with a lot of people as part of my recovery both in the spinal unit and the stroke unit that was right next to it. I was feeling as though there is something in this story that would inspire the people who were recovering around me – who were in worse shape than me - and I wanted to share this experience in a way that would give hope to the other patients. I was spending a lot of time out in the garden talking to God and it was very clear to me that He was listening, and not only listening but responding. I would ask questions like why I am having this experience and recovering and I would hear a voice answer: ‘Because I love you so much,’ and it was a real sense of being clearly connected to something larger than myself. "During this time my friend, Vicky, came to visit me. Her husband, Michael, had died five years before from Melanoma and it had been a hard and tragic time for both of them at the end. We were in the garden, and suddenly I spontaneously started telling her about the five guys who had laid their hands on me. I told her that I knew angels were in this world, including angels who wear red jackets with white crosses on them. I said there were five angels I could name in my life, and then I said, ‘And there’s one more angel. It’s Michael, and he’s here.’ Tears were streaming down her face. I had the sense very clearly that Michael had joined the conversation and I was not speaking for him but as him. There was the feeling that Michael and Vicky experienced a sense of completion and that they were able to forgive each other and that he got to tell her he loved her. It was an incredibly intimate experience. I sensed his presence and that he was speaking through me; I was just channeling. Vicky, my friend, was totally cleansed and had an amazing therapeutic and cathartic encounter. "Just before I went to bed, Michael visited me again and told me something specific to tell his wife; it was so specific, in fact, that I didn’t want to call her in case it wasn’t true. I didn’t want to ruin what had happened in the garden and I thought what if it wasn’t true? So I held on to the message all the next day. I had a big day in rehab – they let me drive a car for the first time – so it took me until that night to actually pick up the phone and call her. ‘Michael came to visit me again last night,’ I said, ‘and he told me something that he wants me to tell you. He told me that he wants you to reread the letter that he wrote to you right after the two of you learned he was terminal, the one that you keep in the box under the bed.’ She broke down, and confirmed the existence of the letter in the box under the bed. She replied that she hadn’t been able to read that letter for years until yesterday, when she had read it for the second time. "It was like the universe saying, ‘Just in case you think any of this is a coincidence, here’s something to think about,’ which leads me to tell you about Maisie. "There was a very old black woman in the spinal rehab unit, named Maisie, who had totally given up. She wasn’t able to walk and was spending all of her time in bed. She was at the stage where the hospital was going to send her to a facility where you just wait to die. Maisie’s bed was way in the back of a double room so you had to peer through the darkness to a small cone of light from the desk lamp next to this small, shriveled woman lying curled up in a bed who had accepted that her end was coming. I visited her several times, and we became friends. "The day after the experience with Vicky, I was back out in the garden, asking, ‘If it’s possible for a group of some guys to perform this healing and transmit this energy to me, then why couldn’t I do that for someone else?’ "And the voice in the garden responded, ‘What makes you think you can’t?’ "’Oh,’ I said simply, and wheeled my chair around and back upstairs, grabbed my friend, Pat, saying, ‘Pat, I need a witness.’ Now Pat was a three-hundred-pound Christian black woman who rode around on a smart scooter and was there for chronic pain. She had been praying for me – a wonderful, warm, earth mother, a deeply faithful, loving woman, an extraordinary presence, and we had become instant friends when I told her my story. We wheeled into Maisie’s room and pulled up on either side of her bed. "'Maisie,’ I said, ‘I’ve been in the garden again, and God told me that he was going to allow me to heal people by putting my hands on them.’ She looked at me and said, ‘Oh, would you put your hands on me, please?’ "She had a whole list of stuff that she wanted me to pray for – she couldn’t walk, she had bed sores, she wasn’t eating, she thought the nursing staff hated her, and I started to pray. I just asked for God to join us and that Maisie would be healed and we prayed for half an hour or more and during that time this incredible energy took place in the room. And when it was over – it was clearly over. "I wheeled back into my room and fell asleep immediately. The next day Pat and I met in the corridor on our little vehicles and here came Maisie walking down the hall with her physical therapist! She’s walking down the hall over to us saying, ‘There he is, the power of Christ has done come though Doug and I can walk again today!’ I know it was Maisie’s own faith that healed her. I just got to be a part of that. She continued to improve, and on the day I left the hospital to go home, Maisie also left the hospital to go home. "Through my direct personal experience, I’ve discovered that we are much more capable of healing than we give ourselves credit for, or than our Western medical establishment generally acknowledges. Further, there are levels of non-physical healing that directly impact a person’s recovery – psychological, emotional, familial, spiritual – and it is possible to access these levels and affect them. These energies are very real and have tremendous power in the recovery process. "Following the whirlwind first year of my recovery, I still had a great deal of pain and paraesthesia (numbness, burning, decreased sensation and motor dysfunction), and reached a point where I hit a plateau in my healing. It seemed as if that was going to be the extent of my recovery. My doctors told me that I had been extremely fortunate to recover to the extent that I had and that I shouldn’t expect much more. "It was a difficult time and a disheartening prognosis. At about 16-months, a friend steered me toward a Qi Gong workshop (the ancient Chinese practice of healing with the mind) given by a Grand Master practitioner. The result was quite extraordinary and opened doors to a whole new level of healing and recovery. I have continued to study ever since, and Adam and I are also students of T’ai Chi and Kung Fu. "That’s the big miracle part of my story. The resonance of that story has been that this dynamic of healing and recovery – for myself and others – has become the central focus of my life. With the addition of Qi Gong and breathing techniques, I’ve combined healing forms that are all valid. Part of it has to do with being open and receptive and part of it has to do with being available to let the magic do its work. Most of all, it’s important simply to ask. "One of the effects of my injury was that it knocked me out of work for a couple of years while I focused on my recovery. By the time I was able to work again, the shows I’d worked for were done and the people I’d worked for were doing other things. It's pretty well known that writers my age, regardless of experience, are having a tough time finding work in the business these days. It's a bit ironic, because I'm still very much at the top of my game physically and creatively. "I’m not sure if it’s possible to get completely better immediately, but I do know it’s possible to get a whole lot better right away. I still deal with residual challenges relative to my injury, but I greet each day with the idea that here is another opportunity to get better. I’ve continued to steadily improve, and now participate regularly in triathlons and other endurance events such as the MS-150 ride. These events for us are like celebrations of recovery, as well as opportunities to make a difference. It’s all about gratitude, compassion and service. "Finally, as a cyclist who lives and trains in Topanga, I want to ask people to please be kind and drive safely. Stay on the right of the double yellow line. We're very exposed when we're out there with nothing under us but a 22-pound bike. The person riding that bike is a real person, a good person, a person with a family, a person to look out for and take care of. Please try to give us space and a little cooperation. To my fellow cyclists, let's do our best to cooperate with the others on the road. If we can all adopt attitudes of looking out for one another, taking care of one another, wouldn't our world be a better place? And to everyone who rides, skis, skateboards or snowboards, please: Wear your helmets!" Comments? Click here
|  |
|
The Twilight Club + A don't miss tidbit! Saturday, November 29, 2008 - 05:58 PM This and That
| Ed Elkin sent me this, and it was so delicious to me -- as it could be delicious to you -- and so timely, that I want to send it back out: http://www.yourchoiceforchange08.org/index.php?d=c3V6YW5uZSB0YXlsb3I=
Another subject: Thanks for the GREAT responses to my title request for my movie, which I'm still sifting through. If more of you are going to give me ideas, the time is NOW. Also, if anyone has any leads to possible funding for marketing my movie, please put me in touch.
One response had something in it that kicked me back to something I periodically trot out and try to float, which also is timely now. As ideas are being offered to the Obama administration, how about it getting behind a revival of The Twilight Club? Throughout the last century, it was an enterprise where leaders of thought came together with the intention of countering the moral decline of society by bolstering spiritual and ethical awareness. It's one of the great treasures of our history, and yet virtually no one has heard of it. If I had clout, it's what I would try to launch. If anyone has the power -- and some of you on this list do -- I would become your enthusiastic helper.
Here's some material that's been written about The Twilight Club:
Some of the members: Rudyard Kipling, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Charles Darwin, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Walt Whitman, Edwin Markham, Mark Twain, Andrew Carnegie, Thomas J. Watson, Rudyard Kipling, Cornelius Vanderbilt, Theodore Roosevelt, Calvin Coolidge, Louis Tiffany, Walter Russell.
Their conviction was that world peace, harmony and unity would only come about through the brotherhood of man. They were convinced that a person's moral creed could not remain as words and platitudes, but must be translated into action. Building on this idea, they formed The Poets' Code of Ethics, intended as a worldwide moral code that related strictly to how people acted towards each other, the ethical nature of the code being based on the concept of service to others and to the world...
Andrew Carnegie strongly advocated the necessity of spreading the seeds of culture, morality and ethics. He promised to endow millions for educational purposes-particularly through building libraries. He also organized the Authors' Club, providing a house on 34th Street in New York, entirely free of charge providing that each member of the club agreed to write something every year that had a direct bearing on and reference to the moral code of ethics. Out of this visionary effort came the Scout movement. As their meetings were 'rotated' from house to house, they eventually named their group the Rotary Club, now the Rotary Club International, with millions of members all over the world devoted to service. Other service clubs followed, such as the Kiwanis and the Lions.
Others inspired by the Twilight Club vision, such as Edwin Markham and Sophie Irene Loeb, worked to bring about change in social conditions, such as the elimination of sweatshops, compulsory education and child labor laws. Eugene Grace, president of the Bethlehem Steel Company, and Adolph Ochs, owner of the New York Times, worked to establish advertising censorship. Thomas J. Watson and Walter Russell campaigned for the elimination of the caveat emptor practice of business, which eventually led to the establishment of the Better Business Bureaus.
After the war years, Thomas J. Watson, head of International Business Machines, became inspired by the ideals of the ethical movement organized by Herbert Spencer, wanting the business world to practice these principles. He offered to pay all expenses necessary for the club activities. He, Walter Russell and Edwin Markham decided to stress culture as well as ethics, since culture stems from the arts, for World War one had caused a drop in cultural growth and patronage of the arts. They decided to call this extension of the Twilight Club, The Society of Arts and Science. Taking leadership, Thomas J. Watson and Walter Russell-who lectured for twelve years to IBM employees on better business practices-worked with others, such as Francis Sisson, from the banking, business and legal world, to uplift the standards of industry, law and justice.
Comments? Click here
| Previous Comments (2048 bytes more)  |
|
"Intelligent Design Without the Bible" Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 02:57 PM This and That
| The debate that rages between evolutionists and supporters of intelligent design is a simplistic reduction of what doesn't come down to an either/or. As humankind unceasingly explores its origins, this mind-jamming conflict needs fleshing out into a bigger picture. Thanks to Roy Gibbon sending this around, I got exposed to Deepak Chopra's intelligent food for thought. Deepak's piece comes from The Huffington Post, where he is a blogger. I've just gotten my feet wet there, as Huffington Post just accepted me as a blogger. I have made only one entry, and, being an old codger, am still fuzzy about the ramifications of that -- like if you blog and nobody reads it, are you still blogging? If there is interest in what gets posted it rises to some level of visibility, soooco, if you guys would read what I wrote, which is a version of a post I made on my blog that I sent to you, and add your comments or flags or bells or whistles or whatever lets them know you like what you read, I would appreciate it. Here's the link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/suzanne-taylor/a-call-for-attention_b_135730.html .Intelligent Design Without the Bible by Deepak Chopra It is disturbing to see that the current debate over evolution has become us-versus-them. To say that Nature displays intelligence doesn't make you a Christian fundamentalist. Einstein said as much, and a fascinating theory called the anthropic principle has been seriously considered by Stephen Hawking, among others. The anthropic principle tries to understand how a random universe could evolve to produce DNA, and ultimately human intelligence. To say the DNA happened randomly is like saying that a hurricane could blow through a junk yard and produce a jet plane.It's high time to rescue "intelligent design" from the politics of religion. There are too many riddles not yet answered by either biology or the Bible, and by asking them honestly, without foregone conclusions, science could take a huge leap forward. If anyone here is interested in placing this debate on a higher plane than us-versus-them, I think the main issues are these: 1. How does nature take creative leaps? In the fossil record there are repeated gaps that no "missing link" can fill. The most glaring is the leap by which inorganic molecules turned into DNA. For billions of years after the Big Bang, no other molecule replicated itself. No other molecule was remotely as complicated. No other molecule has the capacity to string billions of pieces of information that remain self-sustaining despite countless transformations into all the life forms that DNA has produced. 2. If mutations are random, why does the fossil record demonstrate so many positive mutations -- those that lead to new species -- and so few negative ones? Random chance should produce useless mutations thousands of times more often than positive ones. 3. How does evolution know where to stop? The pressure to evolve is constant; therefore it is hard to understand why evolution isn't a constant. Yet sharks and turtles and insects have been around for hundreds of millions of years without apparent evolution except to diversify among their kind. These species stopped in place while others, notably hominids, kept evolving with tremendous speed, even though our primate ancestors didn't have to. The many species of monkeys which persist in original form tell us that human evolution, like the shark's, could have ended. Why didn't it? 4. Evolutionary biology is stuck with regard to simultaneous mutations. one kind of primordial skin cell, for example, mutated into scales, fur, and feathers. These are hugely different adaptations, and each is tremendously complex. How could one kind of cell take three different routes purely at random? 5. If design doesn't imply intelligence, why are we so intelligent? The human body is composed of cells that evolved from one-celled blue-green algae, yet that algae is still around. Why did DNA pursue the path of greater and greater intelligence when it could have perfectly survived in one-celled plants and animals, as in fact it did? 6. Why do forms replicate themselves without apparent need? The helix or spiral shape found in the shell of the chambered nautilus, the center of sunflowers, spiral galaxies, and DNA itself seems to be such a replication. It is mathematically elegant and appears to be a design that was suited for hundreds of totally unrelated functions in nature. 7. What happens when simple molecules come into contact with life? Oxygen is a simple molecule in the atmosphere, but once it enters our lungs, it becomes part of the cellular machinery, and far from wandering about randomly, it precisely joins itself with other simple molecules, and together they perform cellular tasks, such as protein-building, whose precision is millions of times greater than anything else seen in nature. If the oxygen doesn't change physically -- and it doesn't -- what invisible change causes it to acquire intelligence the instant it contacts life? 8. How can whole systems appear all at once? The leap from reptile to bird is proven by the fossil record. Yet this apparent step in evolution has many simultaneous parts. It would seem that Nature, to our embarrassment, simply struck upon a good idea, not a simple mutation. If you look at how a bird is constructed, with hollow bones, toes elongated into wing bones, feet adapted to clutching branches instead of running, etc., none of the mutations by themselves give an advantage to survival, but taken altogether, they are a brilliant creative leap. Nature takes such leaps all the time, and our attempt to reduce them to bits of a jigsaw puzzle that just happened to fall into place to form a beautifully designed picture seems faulty on the face of it. Why do we insist that we are allowed to have brilliant ideas while Nature isn't? 9. Darwin's iron law was that evolution is linked to survival, but it was long ago pointed out that "survival of the fittest" is a tautology. Some mutations survive, and therefore we call them fittest. Yet there is no obvious reason why the dodo, kiwi, and other flightless birds are more fit; they just survived for a while. DNA itself isn't fit at all; unlike a molecule of iron or hydrogen, DNA will blow away into dust if left outside on a sunny day or if attacked by pathogens, x-rays, solar radiation, and mutations like cancer. The key to survival is more than fighting to see which organism is fittest. 10. Competition itself is suspect, for we see just as many examples in Nature of cooperation. Bees cooperate, obviously, to the point that when a honey bee stings an enemy, it acts to save the whole hive. At the moment of stinging, a honeybee dies. In what way is this a survival mechanism, given that the bee doesn't survive at all? For that matter, since a mutation can only survive by breeding -- "survival" is basically a simplified term for passing along gene mutations from one generation to the next -- how did bees develop drones in the hive, that is, bees who cannot and never do have sex? 11. How did symbiotic cooperation develop? Certain flowers, for example, require exactly one kind of insect to pollinate them. A flower might have a very deep calyx, or throat, for example than only an insect with a tremendously long tongue can reach. Both these adaptations are very complex, and they serve no outside use. Nature was getting along very well without this symbiosis, as evident in the thousands of flowers and insects that persist without it. So how did numerous generations pass this symbiosis along if it is so specialized? 12. Finally, why are life forms beautiful? Beauty is everywhere in Nature, yet it serves no obvious purpose. once a bird of paradise has evolved its incredibly gorgeous plumage, we can say that it is useful to attract mates. But doesn't it also attract predators, for we simultaneously say that camouflaged creatures like the chameleon survive by not being conspicuous. In other words, exact opposites are rationalized by the same logic. This is no logic at all. Non-beautiful creatures have survived for millions of years, so have gorgeous ones. The notion that this is random seems weak on the face of it. I don't know who will bother to read all these points, which I have had to truncate. But if you think the answers are in safe hands among the ranks of evolutionary biologists, think again. No credible scientific theory has answered these dilemmas, and progress is being discouraged, I imagine, thanks to fundamentalist Christians. By hijacking the whole notion of intelligent design, they have tarred genuine scientific issues with the stain of religious prejudice. In my next post I will offer a picture of how these questions might be answered. For the next piece, Rescuing Intelligent Design -- But From Whom?, which I found equally valuable, go to http://www.huffingtonpost.com/deepak-chopra/rescuing-intelligent-desi_b_6164.htmlIf you are an evolutionary junkie like me, you also might want to read some follow-up of critique and response. Scroll down on http://www.huffingtonpost.com/searchG/?cx=partner-pub-3264687723376607%3Atlvacw-gkue&cof=FORID%3A11&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=chopra+intelligent+design&sa.x=24&sa.y=9#1427 Comments? Click here
| Previous Comments (1460 bytes more)  |
|
COPERNICUS, DARWIN AND HUBBLE Tuesday, October 07, 2008 - 07:48 PM This and That
| At this precarious time, with hardships ahead that will be serious if not cataclysmic, I want to make a case for opening our minds to what's beyond our ideation about who we are, wherein the problems arose. Given there is no quick fix we can employ to end the global financial crisis, I ask for some consideration of what indeed might blast away the dualistic thinking that led to this morass, where we are pitted against one another, struggling for everything from survival to prosperity. You know I have a familiarity with the crop circle oddity on Earth. Now I want to urge everyone to take an interest in it. What is occurring in crop fields all over the world could get us beyond where we are now. Radical change would come instantly with the recognition that there is a non-human intelligence that's at least on a par with ours. In relation to that otherness, we would be one people, a humanity that could no longer hold sway as the aggressive dominator of the universe. This new perception of ourselves as but one part of a far greater whole would sweep through the civilized world. Try as hard as the entrenched forces might, to cling to what's in place, everyone would be drawn into a new basis for relating to everything. Here's John Mack, speaking with clarity about the worldview that needs to give way: I want to talk about the matter of a worldview and how it works. It has always been referred to as a paradigm and that has more of a scientific flavor. But I prefer to call it "worldview" because it refers to something bigger. A worldview is the way we organize reality. It is the way we believe things work. In a way it is like an instrument of navigation. Our worldview is what holds the human psyche together. What I came to realize with that Harvard Committee was that I was threatening the scientific medical worldview by which they were living. What has been the dominant worldview in our society could be called Newtonian/Cartesianism or anthropocentric humanism. It is a worldview that puts the human being at the top of the cosmic hierarchy of intelligence. The simplest term for this is scientific materialism. In this worldview, matter and energy form the primary reality and there is no larger intelligence in the cosmos. The principle method of study is objective reality, which separates the investigator from the matter that is being investigated.
I just stumbled across something related to our worldview that I'd written after the tsunami, in 2005, that killed almost 300,000 people: Could this shake be big enough to wake us up to the need to set ourselves on another course? An examination of the fundamentals of how we think, based on who we perceive we are and what we think we are doing here, is a much needed conversation for the world to engage in. People eloquently express their outrage about what isn't working, but there isn't a common conversation about how else to run the world. The tsunami could be our spur to rethink everything. Its message is that it's one world -- we need to engage with each other in one system. This would be more important than giving our attention to everything else that needs attending, because, without such an over-arching consideration, we will continue to generate problems that devastate us and be victimized by a lack of preparedness for what nature can impose. That paragraph somehow had made its way onto a website with which I was unfamiliar. Intrigued by the site's URL, http://greatnewstory.com, I found it to be a platform for thoughtful writing about our worldview. This wonderful piece, from that Great New Story site, is a history lesson that describes major shifts in humanity's behavior thanks to Copernicus, Darwin and Hubble changing our ideas of how the universe works. That absolutely fits my line of thinking about how we make ideational leaps, where the next change of worldview could come from paying attention to the crop circles. THE DEMOLITION OF RELIGIOUS MYTHOLOGY John B. Brinsmead September 2, 2008 Since the 16th century three great paradigm shifts have seriously called into question the religious traditions of the Christian West. Whilst the scientific disciplines have been able to adapt to these paradigm shifts, the religious establishments have been thrown into disarray and insecurity, and especially because they have been shackled by their own claims to either ecclesiastical or Biblical infallibility. THE FIRST GREAT PARADIGM SHIFT WAS THE COPERNICAN REVOLUTION The heliocentric cosmology of Copernicus freed humanity from the mythic heavens of supernatural beings, be they gods or demons, and gave us the secular heavens governed by the laws of physics. No longer was the earth to be seen as Dante’s centre of the universe with heaven above and hell beneath. In the new cosmology, the sun did not rotate around the earth as the Church and the Bible implied, but the earth actually moved (contrary to what the Church and the Bible emphatically stated) around the sun. The religious authorities of the 16th century clearly perceived that the heliocentric theory of the universe was a dire threat to their grand narrative of the world. The integrity of the Christian message was tied to a worldview that was part and parcel of that narrative. As one great churchman had put it, "There are four principle winds, four pillars that hold up the sky, and four corners of the universe; therefore it is only right there be four Gospels." Of all of the great ideas in history, this notion, set forth by Nicholas Copernicus in his book, De Revolutionibus Orbium Caelestium, in 1543, was probably the most important, for its consequences were so far reaching. It set off a huge wave of controversy. At first it was just a ripple. But this ripple soon grew into a huge tidal wave of opposition to this heretical idea. In order to appreciate why this idea was so vehemently opposed, one needs to understand the official cosmology of the church and its reasons for promoting this cosmology. This cosmology was largely derived from Dante's Divine Comedy, which itself was, ironically, derived partly from Muslim teachings… Dante paints a vivid picture of the universe, with the Earth at its center, hell being located in the very center of the Earth, and heaven, above… This view of the universe was so congruent with Christian doctrine that it would not easily yield to a new view of the universe no matter how much evidence there may be in support of a new view. Ever since its publication, the cosmology of Dante's book had been an important part of the theology of the Church, both Catholic and Protestant. With mankind's position balanced precariously between heaven and hell, it painted a vivid picture and reinforced the basic belief system of the church. Morality, cosmology, and theology were completely intertwined. At first the opposition came only from Protestant circles. one of the first to speak out against this new heresy was Martin Luther. He called Copernicus a fool, pointing out that the biblical story of Joshua clearly states that Joshua commanded the sun to stand still, not the Earth. Other Protestants soon joined in. Calvin cited the opening verse of psalm 93-"The Earth is stabilized that it cannot be moved." Church officials began to search the Bible with a fine tooth comb, looking for passages that "prove" Copernicus is wrong. Eventually the Catholic Church joined in the battle, banning Copernicus's book in the year 1610. Copernicus's heliocentric theory was so violently opposed, not so much because it contradicted the Bible, which it does, but because it made nonsense out of the official theology of Christianity… Here are the main objections to the heliocentric theory, as pointed out by the Pope himself. If Earth is just another planet, circling the sun with the other planets, how can the Earth be a place of iniquity and sin, with devils below and angels above? He said that Copernicus's theory makes a mockery of the ascension of Christ, because if the Earth is orbiting the sun, how could Christ have ascended up to heaven? If the stars are not the lights of heaven, but actually other suns, as the theory suggests, then God, in His infinite goodness, would have created inhabitants on them too. How could Christ have died for the sins of all of the inhabitants of these other planets? Many Copernicans believed that the universe was infinite. This was one of the worst heresies of all. If the universe is infinite, then where can the throne of God be located? No wonder the Pope said that the Copernican heresy is the greatest threat there has ever been to Christianity and should be wiped out at all costs.
The Church’s position was totally wrong, back to front, upside down and contrary to reality. It took the Church a very long time to sense that it had lost its battle with the Copernican worldview. Yet even whilst finally admitting that Copernicus was right, it still tried to carry on with its mythic narrative of the universe as if nothing had happened to render it so much meaningless mumbo jumbo. The Copernican Revolution was only the beginning of a far greater over-turning of the Church’s grand narrative of the world. THE SECOND GREAT PARADIGM SHIFT WAS DARWIN'S 19TH CENTURY BIOLOGICAL REVOLUTION Wallace and Darwin clearly demonstrated that life forms such as plants, animals and humans did not suddenly appear on the earth in response to some creation fiat. Creation was not something that happened as recently as 4004 B.C. according to the grand narrative of the Christian religion. Creation was now to be seen as a process that has been going on for billions of years and as something that will continue into the future. The priestly author of Genesis 1 dreamt that creation was finished by the seventh day. This writer, of course, was totally oblivious of the space/time realities of a modern scientific cosmology. We now know that if the expanding activity of our universe were to cease, the universe would collapse into the Big Crunch. The Darwinian Revolution calls into question the age-old dogmas of the Fall of man from an original perfection, original sin, a literal Garden of Eden, the origin of death in the sin of Adam and the grand narrative of Fall and Redemption that Milton outlined so well in his Paradise Lost. According to this very old religious narrative, death originated in the sin of man at the dawn of history. It is a monstrous dogma because it makes man ultimately responsible for death and everything else that goes wrong on the planet. The Biological Revolution presents an entirely different worldview wherein great carnivores like saber tooth tigers and dinosaurs roamed the earth long before humans were around. The complimentary science of geology found evidence of catastrophic upheavals and mass extinctions of life forms taking place long before humans had arrived on the scene. The old narrative about the origin of death in the Fall of man has been exposed as a nonsense myth that is no better than the myth of the little three-story universe of the pre-Copernican age. Just think for a moment what the 16th century divines were alleging. The earth is more than a million times smaller than the sun, yet it was supposed to generate sufficient gravity to cause the sun to orbit the earth. The old creation myth is up-side-down, back-to-front and nothing like reality. "Perhaps the greatest gift Darwin gave to humanity was the opportunity to see in all of life an ongoing, intelligent, creative drama. Rather than thinking of a form of life as having been put on Earth in a fixed form at the beginning of time, we now see each form of life arising out of the Great Adventure." Brian Swimme and Thomas Berry, The Universe Story, p. 138
THE THIRD GREAT PARADIGM SHIFT WAS THE UNIVERSE OF THE BIG BANG Prior to Einstein and Hubble, our Milky Way Galaxy was thought to comprise the entire "steady state" universe. We now know that our Milky Way Galaxy is just one of billions of other galaxies all containing billions of stars like our own sun. So far from being an enormous entity at the centre of the universe, planet Earth has receded into being an almost infinitely small speck of star dust in one tiny little solar system within the Milky Way Galaxy. Further, there is no longer a "steady state" universe as formerly supposed, but one that is still rapidly expanding as the galaxies are driven apart by dark energy by at least the speed of light. These time/space realities indicate that our universe began with the Big Bang around 15 billion years ago. The implications of these three paradigm shifts for theology are breathtaking. What a mind-blowing view of creation is now revealed compared to that little three-storied universe of the divines who relied upon the worldview of the Bible! What do the time/space realities of a post-Hubble universe do to the old theology that is based on a primitive worldview? Gone forever is this puny three-tiered universe of heaven above, hell below and humans in the middle, and wondering which way they will go. Gone forever is the power of the old myths peddled by the Church and derived from a primitive worldview. Copernicus and Galileo banished the mythical heavens of gods and demons and gave us secular heavens governed by the laws of physics. We now know that there are no laws operating out there/up there that are not operating down here, and there is no God up there that is not down here. Gone forever are the ideas of a literal Fall of man, original sin and mankind being the originators of death. The Biological Revolution sweeps away the mythic nonsense of pre-Enlightenment humans. Called into question are such doctrines as a bodily resurrection and ascension to heaven, eschatology and ideas of a Second Advent. This is the time to let the fresh breeze of reality sweep away the mythic cobwebs from modern minds. What is the wisdom of basing an entire theological edifice on an Adam who never existed and a literal Fall into original sin that didn’t happen? Trotting out these old theological premises now is like bringing out the old mumbo jumbo used to fob off the challenge of Copernicus. As we stand astonished before these three paradigm shifts that have swept away the myths of centuries, what remains of value is the life and teachings of the real historical Jesus. None of his teachings, however, appear in any of the Creeds of the Church. Those Creeds are concerned only with a mythical world and the mythical dogma about a mythical person. Clearly, what can’t survive are the following mythical ideas: 1. The mythical Second Adam. If the first Adam is mythic, so is the second one. 2. The pre-existence of Jesus. Jesus was not a space man. He didn’t live eternally in a heavenly world, nor was he born supernaturally on this planet in a way that defies the laws of genetics and DNA. The virgin birth stories (whether from Greek mythology or Christian mythology) are as mythical as the old cosmological order of gods in the sky and demons below us. 3. Jesus’s physical body did not rise from the grave and ascend into heaven. Physical objects don’t fly off into outer space. Even if his ascending physical body moved with the speed of light, he would not have moved far in two thousand years within a universe where some of nearest stars are millions of light years away. 4. His death was not required to undo Adam’s Fall and to open some mythical Pearly Gates in the sky. 5. Gone are all eschatological speculations about Millenniums, Raptures and a Second Coming. This latter is a doctrine of horrendous genocidal brutality. It teaches that at the Second Advent, all those living on the earth except for the elect believers will be delivered to destruction and everlasting punishment. No Hitler, Stalin or Pol Pot inaugurated a mass extermination on this scale of all creatures living upon the earth. Billions of men, women and little children are all supposed to perish together at this glorious Second Advent. Such views rise out of incorrect ideas of the Earth’s beginnings. If the notions of the beginnings are so obviously wrong, the notions about the conclusions to history will also be wrong. 6. Claims that Jesus is God or the second person of the Divine Trinity are also mythic imaginations that have more to do with old pagan myths than the Church has been prepared to admit. In any case, these are myths that belong to an outmoded cosmology. Surviving the three great paradigm shifts associated with the breakthroughs of Copernicus, Darwin and Hubble is the real Jesus of history. Here is a flesh and blood Jesus with human parents, 46 chromosomes, normal cellular DNA and real brothers and sisters. This real Jesus of Nazareth, like the great prophets of the Old Testament before him, dared to teach the scandalous idea that being truly human (concerned about compassion and justice for all) was all-important whilst being religious had no importance at all. He brought to his very religious and myth-dominated culture a new vision of unconditional love, forgiveness and justice that would embrace the whole human family without discrimination on account of creed, social standing or race. Unlike the Church that followed on after him, he freed rather than enslaved people to religious dogma and myths. Web Published – August 2008 Copyright © 2008 John B. Brinsmead Comments? Click here
| Previous Comments (42131 bytes more)  |
|
Jesus and Peak Oil Saturday, September 06, 2008 - 09:23 PM worldpress
| Rex Weyler has vision. (Look at the last thing of his I posted -- trust me you wont be sorry even if you just take a fast peek: http://theconversation.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=199&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0.) This piece here on peak oil isn't a woe-is-me, although all the categories where we are threatened are front and center: Our massive growth economies were built with cheap oil. Poorly planned development left behind disappearing forests, toxic lakes, soil erosion, species loss, foul air, dead rivers, drying aquifers, and creeping deserts.
But what Rex presents embraces all of that in a bigger picture of how it would be if we intelligently deal, in systematic ways, with what our oil situation calls for: Human society can change. Witness the historic changes to establish democracies, end slavery, secure civil and womens rights, or eradicate polio and AIDS. Humanity can harness its resources to change destructive habits and improve living conditions. The crisis of peak oil provides an opportunity strengthen the two pillars that nourish real quality of life: local community and wild nature.
Rex is quite a guy. He was one of the founders of Greenpeace, and, surprise surprise, his newest book is The Jesus Sayings: A Quest for His Authentic Sayings. In The Jesus Sayings, I raise two more questions, presuming that we might approach some understanding of Jesus’ authentic message. How did that message get confused or misrepresented? What relevance does that message offer us in the twenty-first century? To answer these questions, I’ve examined the research of scholars such as Crossan and Reed, Robert J. Miller, Elaine Pagels, Burton Mack, Bart Ehrman, Karen King, Margaret Starbird, Nicholas Wright, Robert Funk, Westar Institute’s Jesus Seminar, and the Committee for the Scientific Examination of Religion’s Jesus Project. These scholars attempt to answer the questions raised by Reimarus: What can we reasonably say about the historical Jesus, and what did this person teach? Our modern ecological crisis appears as a crisis of spirit, failing to see the miracle in which we live. Our destruction of the earth follows hording over sharing, private ego over common sense, dominance over humility, and addictive consumption over simple pleasures. Human civilization looked for paradise in all the wrong places, in power, wealth, in myriad heavens. We have failed to worship — to ascribe worth to — the one thing that sustains us: the living earth. A new reformation in religion and spirituality will recognize the inherent value of the earth itself, life itself, other beings for their own sake, not for private glory. So, with that as background, see if you aren't nodding yes to this vision Rex is presenting here. And, if you'd like to create a community along the lines he proposes, please invite me to be in it: Peak Oil drastically changes global economy By Rex Weyler As the era of cheap liquid fuels draws to an end, everything about modern consumer society will change. Likewise, developing societies pursuing the benefits of globalization will struggle to grow economies in an era of scarce liquid fuels. The most localized, self-reliant communities will experience the least disruption. Oil is a fixed asset of the planet, representing stored sunlight accumulated over a billion years as early marine algae, and other marine organisms (not dinosaurs) captured solar energy, formed carbon bonds, gathered nutrients, died, sank to the ocean floors, and lay buried under eons of sediment. Like any fixed non-renewable resource, oil is limited, and its consumption will rise, peak, and decline. World oil production increased for 150 years until the spring of 2005, when world crude oil production reached about 74.3 million barrels per day (mb/d), and total liquid fuels, including tar sands, liquefied gas, and biofuels reached about 85 mb/d. In spite of the efforts since, and tales of "trillions of barrels" of oil in undiscovered fields, liquid fuel production has remained at about 85.5 mb/d for three years, the longest sustained plateau in modern petroleum history. Discoveries of new fields peaked 40 years ago. Meanwhile economies everywhere want to grow, so demand for oil soars worldwide. The gap between this surging demand and flat or declining production will drive price increases and shortages. That’s peak oil. Peak experience Peak oil is not a theory, but rather a simple observation of a common natural occurrence. Peak oil is only one symptom of an exponentially growing population, with exponentially growing demands, reaching worldwide limits of all resources. "Peak oil has long been a reality for the oil industry," says Anita M Burke, former Shell International senior advisor on Climate Change and Sustainability. "To believe anything else belies the facts of science." In 2007, Dr James Schlesinger, former US Defense and Energy Secretary stated flatly, "If you talk to industry leaders, they concede … we are facing a decline in liquid fuels. The battle is over. The peakists have won." Global warming, caused primarily by forest destruction and the burning of fossil fuels, now aggravates natural limits and the human turmoil that these limits provoke. one might think that peak oil will solve global warming because less oil means less carbon emissions. Sadly, this is not so because humanity took the best, cheapest, and easiest oil first, leaving dirty, acidic, expensive oil in marginal reserves that require vast amounts of energy to recover. In the 1930s, 100 barrels of oil cost about 1 barrel in equivalent energy to extract. That ratio is now about 20:1 and sinking fast. The Canadian tar sands produce barely 1:1 net energy. By the time someone burns tar sands oil in his or her vehicle, the industry has burned nearly an equal amount retrieving it. When we account for the net energy left after production, and population growth, we discover that the world peak for net-oil per-capita occurred three decades ago, in 1979. Many oil suppliers – Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and others – recognizing the limits of the resource, are now keeping more of their oil for domestic use, and saving it for future growth. Regardless of energy alternatives – ethanol, nuclear, solar, wind, tidal – humanity will never again enjoy the current consumption rates of cheap, convenient fuels. This fact changes everything. We witness the impact in the increasing scarcity and cost of food and other critical resources that rely on oil. Most trucking firms now add a fuel surcharge to hedge against fuel price increases. As fuel prices soar, airlines cancel flights or simply close down. In many cities, police add a gas charge to traffic tickets because police departments have already spent their annual fuel budget on high-priced gasoline. The post-peak oil era will require new human development patterns and strategies that cope with limits to growth. Humanity has no new continents to exploit or planets to occupy. Frantic industrial nations may drill in the Arctic and dig into dirty tar sands, but none of this will increase or even match the past abundance of cheap liquid fuel that we have already squandered. Nevertheless, the actual moment that world oil production peaks is less relevant than our preparation for the impact. Relocalization Well-financed voices promoting global industrialization claim our economies can grow "forever," or "for the foreseeable future," but these voices cry out against the evidence before our eyes. Our massive growth economies were built with cheap oil. Poorly planned development left behind disappearing forests, toxic lakes, soil erosion, species loss, foul air, dead rivers, drying aquifers, and creeping deserts. The dream of a globalized world marketplace linked by airplanes and trucks will not endure. Monolithic superstores that rely on liquid fuels to ship cheap goods around the world will become the relics of the cheap oil era. These massive chain stores also undermine the local enterprise that communities will need to survive. "The current solutions being bantered about are inadequate to the conditions we are faced with," says Anita Burke, after decades inside the oil industry. "We must embrace adaptation strategies that immediately create whole new ways of being in relationship to each other and the planet. Buy local, get off of hydrocarbons in every aspect of your life, gather in community, and espouse only love - your grandchildren’s lives depend on it." Communities addicted to cheap oil, especially suburban environments without public transport, will become untenable. Regions that still build highways for cars are simply designing their own demise. Smart communities will design light, convenient public transport to run efficiently on the most locally available energy source. The post-peak oil era will require that we re-establish local manufacturing and food production, and refurbish economies that have been gutted by globalization. Smart urban designers are now planning for the end of cheap energy, global warming, and the human migration that these changes will set in motion. Smart neighbourhood and regional planners are preparing communities for the inevitable transition from escalating consumption to conserver societies, built on a human scale and linked to social services and the natural cycles that sustain them..Building communities in nature I recently walked through an abandoned industrial section of Vancouver, where I live. The empty, poorly designed, decaying buildings seemed depressing, but I noticed how much actual green space flourished with wild plants. Squatters with gardening skills, I kept thinking, could make a life for themselves here. Human society can change. Witness the historic changes to establish democracies, end slavery, secure civil and women’s rights, or eradicate polio and AIDS. Humanity can harness its resources to change destructive habits and improve living conditions. The crisis of peak oil provides an opportunity strengthen the two pillars that nourish real quality of life: local community and wild nature. Relocalize: The end of cheap oil means less products arriving from around the world and less jobs making junk to sell elsewhere. Globalization is literally running out of gas. As fuel prices soar, communities will have to supply more food, water, and vital resources locally. If you are thinking of earning a degree in international finance, it might be smart to take some permaculture courses as well. Preserve farmland: Wise communities will preserve agricultural land, support farmers, provide local food for local consumption, compost all organic waste including sewage, build soils, apply efficient water use, move toward vegetable diets, and restore and replenish water resources. Rather than building suburbs and highways on farmland, smart communities will design small residential neighbourhoods on the least-arable land, integrated with the life-giving farmland and natural bounty that supports a healthy society. Change the pattern of community: The entire distribution of public activity, public space, and housing must adapt to less fuel and resource consumption. Past planning in the cheap-oil era created public dysfunction, decaying city cores, foul air, and squandered energy. We do not have generations to correct these mistakes – the time we have to act is now best measured in months, not decades. We now face the choice of responding gracefully and wisely or reacting later in chaos. Productive urban green spaces: Cities face huge challenges and require green space, not only for play and peace of mind, but for food. Suburbs and urban neighbourhoods must be redesigned to transform lawns and streets into productive green zones linked by public transport. Planting trees anywhere reduces global warming. Cities such as Bogotá, Columbia, and San Luis Obispo, California, have shown that degraded cities can revitalize community and economic life with programs that increase green space. Public transport: Basing development and land-use patterns on the private automobile may be the worst design decision in human history. The automobile is responsible for resource depletion, global warming, degraded farmland, alienated neighbourhoods, aesthetic eyesores, time wasted in traffic, and an epidemic of transport death and injury. Light rail public transport is clean, energy efficient, safe, community-building, and allows travelers to be productive rather than stressed. Smart cities will implement public transit, encourage bicycle use, and create neighbourhoods that encourage walking for most services and family needs. 100% recycling: Nature recycles everything. There is no "away" in nature where garbage and waste is thrown. Human communities must mimic the 100% recycling of nature, eliminate designed obsolescence, and turn garbage landfills into recycling centres. Sewage is natural compost that can be converted to productive soil, as demonstrated in Sweden, India, and Mongolia. Preserve wilderness: Smart ecological planning not only nurtures people but also preserves wilderness habitat for species diversity. In regions where indigenous people still live on the land, wilderness also preserves cultural diversity and knowledge of local food, medicines and resources. Modern consumer cities – made possible by the age of cheap fuels, designed for cash profits, or not designed at all – alienated people from each other and from their organic roots. When we gaze upon degraded cement landscapes and the lost souls of inner city children taking refuge in gangs and drugs, we see the cost of broken communities. The end of cheap fuels may help us reclaim an authentic quality of life, not purchased with more stuff but with relationship: our affiliation with each other and with nature.Rex Weyler is author, journalist, ecologist and long-time Greenpeace trouble-maker. Courtesy: www.greenpeace.org.uk Comments? Click here
| Previous Comments (26874 bytes more)  |
|
The Antikythera is a big WOW!!! Monday, August 04, 2008 - 12:15 AM This and That
| So as not to be a one-note person, here's something besides crop circles to be in awe of. I don't know what else to say but WOW! As listmember Monika Roloff, from Australia, who sent me this says, it's "certain proof of more elite knowledge and civilizations 2,000 years ago..." Click for streaming video: http://www.nature.com/nature/videoarchive/antikytheraI'm reminded of Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race , which challenges the prevailing theory of Darwinian evolution. That book, which could blast us out of our worldview, contains evidence of ancient human origins -- 914 pages of what can't be, but is. Our science-based worldview won't admit such information -- it would change everything, and we are attached to the way we've explained things to be. Anything that doesn't just add more information to society's pile, but instead forces us to erect a new pile, always has a hard time getting through. I interviewed author Michael Cremo at a crop circle conference for my documentary, but the background noise unfortunately prevented me from using the footage. This is from his website: "Over the past two centuries researchers have found bones and artifacts showing that people like ourselves existed on earth millions of years ago. But the scientific establishment has ignored these remarkable facts because they contradict the dominant views of human origins and antiquity. Cremo and Thompson challenge us to rethink our understanding of human origins, identity, and destiny. Forbidden Archeology takes on one of the most fundamental components of the modern scientific world view, and invites us to take a courageous first step towards a new perspective."This is from a review on the site: "...the existence of human bones that were discovered in Illinois in rock from the Carboniferous period as well as human footprints from the same period in Kentucky and from the Jurassic period in Turkmenistan. Man was not only living in these remote periods, but also he had already an advanced civilization. As evidence they cite fossil anchors found in the depths of quarries, a mysterious inscription on a piece of marble extracted from its natural rock, a piece of money from the middle Pleistocene, a fossilized shoe sole from the Triassic, and even a metal vase from the Precambrian (600 million years ago). Official science, charge Cremo and Thompson, refuses to take into account these vestiges because they threaten the established conception of the origin of man."
Comments? Click here
| Previous Comments (7937 bytes more)  |
|
A CALL FOR NEW ATTENTION Sunday, July 20, 2008 - 06:11 PM cropcirclediary
|
We love our science fiction, but we titter when we talk about UFOs. People go into modes of rebuttal rather than accepting information as reportage. Have you been watching Larry King of late? He's done two programs about UFOs in the last two weeks, where government and military officials gave testimonials to their astonishing experiences, but, de rigueur, a member of the Skeptic's Society has been there to shoot them down. What I'd like to draw attention to, which never gets discussed, is how valuable it would be if extraterrestrials turned out to be the real deal. Instead of mocking all the reports, if we had our heads on straight we'd be investigating them. Getting heads on straight is the imperative of our time. How else can we get beyond our dualistic, 'us or them' thinking, where opposition is the norm? The reality of another intelligence would be the biggest news since Galileo. When we found out Earth wasn't the center of the solar system, let alone not the center of the universe, we were freed from a worldview in which our planet dominated. Our social order then couldn't hold, and, in a less than lordly light, kings gave way to democracies and we got the science that defines our modern world. With problems being global now, in order to keep our world habitable we need another new social order. It is imperative that we get past our worldview of scientific materialism, which creates an 'us or them' world in which we fight over goods and whoever has the most toys wins. We need to transcend factional behavior that stretches the disparity between the rich and the poor to where revolutions take place, and keeps us resorting to war to resolve conflicts.
A next leap would come if we knew there was other intelligent life. In relating to what's not ourselves, we would be one humanity, and we would have the lid off the smallness in which we gun for one another. It is reasonable that we can get to this awareness via the crop circle phenomenon, where the evidence of visitation is available to see and to study. In fact, the science that has been done on the phenomenon, and written up in peer reviewed pieces in science journals, concludes that something beyond our reality is delivering the circles to us. While what delivers the glyphs will remain a mystery, knowing that something is watching us and signaling us is enough -- it's that they are, not who they are that's important. Our government, on the premise that people would panic if they knew something beyond our control was engaging us, put a lid on investigating what could be other intelligences. See the REPORT OF SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL on UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS CONVENED BY OFFICE OF SCIENTIFIC INTELLIGENCE, CIA January 14 - 18, 1953, for long-classified info on a meeting that set government policy, which was to ridicule rather than investigate UFOs. However, after many years of delivering non-threatening beauty, we could rest easy in the awareness that if the circles come from elsewhere there isn't going to be an invasion. Just knowing we aren't alone would be a huge deal. However, if we established that, there could be more. The technology of 'the other' is more advanced than ours, which we can conclude since they are visiting us and not the other way around, and what they are capable of might help us solve our great environmental problems, like oil depletion and global warming, that threaten our survival.
So why do our visitors make crop circles instead of doing things that would be helpful to us? Maybe there needs to be a receptivity for us to get more from them. If sending circles is their hello, it makes sense to me that we'd need to respond for them to go further. I see them patiently awaiting our aha, where we get it that they are out there. Then, we'd own that awareness. We could meet them, then, rather than being dominated or subjugated by them, which is an old sort of science fiction scenario. Human begins have it in our psyches that we hate being conned -- a fear that flourishes in the right and wrong world. But a higher order, that can subsume that one, is the realm of mystery. This cosmos is so awesome, where we continually pierce more of its veils, that some openness to what we don't know is good for us. It keeps us dreaming, a state in which new and better realities could be ushered in. Here's what my favorite cosmologist, physicist Brian Swimme, has to say about that, in reflections he made after seeing my almost finished documentary, WALKING IN CIRCLES: Albert Einstein once remarked that for the human there is no more powerful feeling than that of the "mysterious." In fact, he was convinced this feeling for the mysterious was the cradle for all works of science, art, and religion. In light of Einstein's conviction, one might ask: "What is the opposite of a feeling for the mysterious?" The opposite would be the sense that one understands it all. The opposite would be the feeling that one is in possession of a system that explains all the phenomena in the universe. For such a person, the universe loses its appeal for it becomes something we don't really need to pay attention to. The universe becomes an exemplification of a theory that one has already understood. No real surprises are possible, only the working out of a logical system through time. When a feeling for the mysterious is lost, one become s vulnerable to the various fundamentalisms plaguing our planet, each one with its passionate certainty that it has all the answers while every other system is just superstition. In moments of stress and breakdown, there is a powerful drive in us to acquire answers and explanations. Certainly in our own time when we are dismantling ecosystems around the planet and deconstructing the stable climate upon which our civilization is based, we feel a deep need to know what is real and what is good and how to proceed. This need can become so great we are liable to latch onto one of these simplistic pseudo-explanations just to quell the feelings of fear and doom surfacing in us. "Walking in Circles" does not provide any such simplistic explanations. This restraint is one of its greatest achievements. By insisting that the Crop Circles are beyond any easy explanation, "Walking in Circles" enables us to make peace with living in the ambiguity of not knowing. This ability to live with ambiguity is related to a sense for the mysterious and together these two may be the most important factors for deep creativity to take place. At the very least, we need to realize that an embrace of ambiguity is a form of humility when confronted by the magnificent complexity of nature.
One of the great benefits of viewing WALKING IN CIRCLES is the feeling one can get of wading into the mysterious. Through its balanced and wide-open approach to the phenomena of crop circles, the film has the power to ease us out of some of the prior certainties we might have had. WALKING IN CIRCLES explores and celebrates the fact of the existence of these designs. And as we are guided into this reflection, we find ourselves considering new ideas about the nature of our universe. We begin to imagine that things might be different than we thought. We might even begin to release ourselves from some of the tired explanations lodged into our minds by the media. But most important of all, as we view the film we might even begin to feel stunned by the simple fact that here we are in the midst of this overwhelming mystery, the universe.
Since my film isn't finished, there's no viewing to be had yet. (Here's a URL I gave before to an 11-minute promo for it: http://www.mightycompanions.org/cropcircles/trailer/cc.html. The name has changed and may change again before the film comes out. Suggestions are welcome.) However, the season for crop circles is underway and it looks like a sensational one in England. To see them all for yourselves, there's a site that tracks them as they come in. See http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/2008.html for what's arrived so far.  Comments? Click here
| Previous Comments (11390 bytes more)  |
|
Say it's so!!!! Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 06:53 PM worldpress
| This made me feel good. One of the spiritual arenas I studied, in a several year class called Nature of the Soul, was the Alice Bailey work. In that discipline, which concerned the evolution of conscious awareness, we looked at the lack of enlightened thinking in government -- as contrasted to new thinking in business, science, and everywhere else -- where government was so crass that conscious people stayed out of it, and it seemed that field would be the last to open to higher thinking. Could Obama be the start of something new? Is Obama an enlightened being? Spiritual wise ones say: This sure isn't no ordinary politician. You buying it?By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist Friday, June 6, 2008 I find I'm having this discussion, this weird little debate, more and more, with colleagues, with readers, with liberals and moderates and miserable, deeply depressed Republicans and spiritually amped persons of all shapes and stripes and I'm having it in particular with those who seem confused, angry, unsure, thoroughly nonplussed, as they all ask me the same thing: What the hell's the big deal about Obama? I, of course, have an answer. Sort of. Warning: If you are a rigid pragmatist/literalist, itchingly evangelical, a scowler, a doubter, a burned-out former '60s radical with no hope left, or are otherwise unable or unwilling to parse alternative New Age speak, click away right now, because you ain't gonna like this one little bit. Ready? It goes likes this: Barack Obama isn't really one of us. Not in the normal way, anyway. This is what I find myself offering up more and more in response to the whiners and the frowners and to those with broken or sadly dysfunctional karmic antennae - or no antennae at all - to all those who just don't understand and maybe even actively recoil against all this chatter about Obama's aura and feel and MLK/JFK-like vibe. To them I say, all right, you want to know what it is? The appeal, the pull, the ethereal and magical thing that seems to enthrall millions of people from all over the world, that keeps opening up and firing into new channels of the culture normally completely unaffected by politics? No, it's not merely his youthful vigor, or handsomeness, or even inspiring rhetoric. It is not fresh ideas or cool charisma or the fact that a black president will be historic and revolutionary in about a thousand different ways. It is something more. Even Bill Clinton, with all his effortless, winking charm, didn't have what Obama has, which is a sort of powerful luminosity, a unique high-vibration integrity. Dismiss it all you like, but I've heard from far too many enormously smart, wise, spiritually attuned people who've been intuitively blown away by Obama's presence - not speeches, not policies, but sheer presence - to say it's just a clever marketing ploy, a slick gambit carefully orchestrated by hotshot campaign organizers who, once Obama gets into office, will suddenly turn from perky optimists to vile soul-sucking lobbyist whores, with Obama as their suddenly evil, cackling overlord. Here's where it gets gooey. Many spiritually advanced people I know (not coweringly religious, mind you, but deeply spiritual) identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who has the ability to lead us not merely to new foreign policies or health care plans or whatnot, but who can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet, of relating and connecting and engaging with this bizarre earthly experiment. These kinds of people actually help us evolve. They are philosophers and peacemakers of a very high order, and they speak not just to reason or emotion, but to the soul. The unusual thing is, true Lightworkers almost never appear on such a brutal, spiritually demeaning stage as national politics. This is why Obama is so rare. And this why he is so often compared to Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr., to those leaders in our culture whose stirring vibrations still resonate throughout our short history. Are you rolling your eyes and scoffing? Fine by me. But you gotta wonder, why has, say, the JFK legacy lasted so long, is so vital to our national identity? Yes, the assassination canonized his legend. The Kennedy family is our version of royalty. But there's something more. Those attuned to energies beyond the literal meanings of things, these people say JFK wasn't assassinated for any typical reason you can name. It's because he was just this kind of high-vibration being, a peacemaker, at odds with the war machine, the CIA, the dark side. And it killed him. Now, Obama. The next step. Another try. And perhaps, as Bush laid waste to the land and embarrassed the country and pummeled our national spirit into disenchanted pulp and yet ironically, in so doing has helped set the stage for an even larger and more fascinating evolutionary burp, we are finally truly ready for another Lightworker to step up. Let me be completely clear: I'm not arguing some sort of Utopian revolution, a big global group hug with Obama as some sort of happy hippie camp counselor. I'm not saying the man's going to swoop in like a superhero messiah and stop all wars and make the flowers grow and birds sing and solve world hunger and bring puppies to schoolchildren. Please. I'm also certainly not saying he's perfect, that his presidency will be free of compromise, or slimy insiders, or great heaps of politics-as-usual. While Obama's certainly an entire universe away from George W. Bush in terms of quality, integrity, intelligence and overall inspirational energy, well, so is your dog. Hell, it isn't hard to stand far above and beyond the worst president in American history. But there simply is no denying that extra kick. As one reader put it to me, in a way, it's not even about Obama, per se. There's a vast amount of positive energy swirling about that's been held back by the armies of BushCo darkness, and this energy has now found a conduit, a lightning rod, is now effortlessly self-organizing around Obama's candidacy. People and emotions and ideas of high and positive vibration are automatically draw to him. It's exactly like how Bush was a magnet for the low vibrational energies of fear and war and oppression and aggression, but, you know, completely reversed. And different. And far, far better. Don't buy any of it? Think that's all a bunch of tofu-sucking New Agey bulls-- and Obama is really a dangerously elitist political salesman whose inexperience will lead us further into darkness because, when you're talking national politics, nothing, really, ever changes? I understand. I get it. I often believe it myself. Not this time. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thoughts about this column? E-mail Mark: mmorford@sfgate.com Mark Morford's Notes & Errata column appears every Wednesday and Friday on SFGate and in the Datebook section of the San Francisco Chronicle. To get on the e-mail list for this column, please click here http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/newsletter/services/main and remove one article of clothing.Mark's column also has an RSS feed and an archive of past columns, which includes another small photo of Mark potentially sufficient for you to recognize him in the street and give him gifts. He also has a raw Facebook page, but has little idea why. Comments? Click here
| Previous Comments (9221 bytes more)  |
|
Another Look at Reverend Wright Friday, April 04, 2008 - 06:32 PM worldpress
| What happens around Obama has impelled me to post more frequently than I have of late. The posts aren't for the purpose of supporting his presidential bid, but because there is new subject matter in the air. The content has been with us forever, but what's new is that we're getting spurs to see beyond conventional wisdom. "Making sense of these times," indeed. Beyond the sound bites about Reverend Wright is another reality. It's not the one from the last post, which explained how Wright could come to deliver his offending comments, but information from a white parishioner of Wright's who is married to a black woman. Get a glimpse into Wright's heart, and look at the enormous good he has done that any one would be a hero to have accomplished. This piece is rich in food for thought. Rev. Wright in a different light By William A. Von Hoene Jr. Chicago Tribune March 26, 2008 During the last two weeks, excerpts from sermons of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr., pastor for more than 35 years at Trinity United Church of Christ on Chicago's South Side, have flooded the airwaves and dominated our discourse about the presidential campaign and race.Wright has been depicted as a racial extremist, or just a plain racist. A number of political figures and news commentators have attempted to use Sen. Barack Obama's association with him to call into question Obama's judgment and the sincerity of his commitment to unity. I have been a member of Trinity, a church with an almost entirely African-American congregation, for more than 25 years. I am, however, a white male. From a decidedly different perspective than most Trinitarians, I have heard Wright preach about racial inequality many times, in unvarnished and passionate terms. In Obama's recent speech in Philadelphia on racial issues confronting our nation, the senator eloquently observed that Rev. Wright's sermons reflect the difficult experiences and frustrations of a generation. It is important that we understand the dynamic Obama spoke about. It also is important that we not let media coverage and political gamesmanship isolate selected remarks by Wright to the exclusion of anything else that might define him more accurately and completely. I find it very troubling that we have distilled Wright's 35-year ministry to a few phrases; no context whatsoever has been offered or explored. I do have a bit of personal context. About 26 years ago, I became engaged to my wife, an African-American. She was at that time and remains a member of Trinity. Somewhere between the ring and the altar, my wife had second thoughts and broke off the engagement. Her decision was grounded in race: So committed to black causes, the daughter of parents subjected to unthinkable prejudice over the years, an "up-and-coming" leader in the young black community, how could she marry a white man? Rev. Wright, whom I had met only in passing at the time and who was equally if not more outspoken about "black" issues than he is today, somehow found out about my wife's decision. He called and asked her to "drop everything" and meet with him at Trinity. He spent four hours explaining his reaction to her decision. Racial divisions were unacceptable, he said, no matter how great or prolonged the pain that caused them. God would not want us to assess or make decisions about people based on race. The world could make progress on issues of race only if people were prepared to break down barriers that were much easier to let stand. Rev. Wright was pretty persuasive; he presided over our wedding a few months later. In the years since, I have watched in utter awe as Wright has overseen and constructed a support system for thousands in need on the South Side that is far more impressive and effective than any governmental program possibly could approach. And never in my life have I been welcomed more warmly and sincerely than at Trinity. Never. I hope that as a nation, we take advantage of the opportunity the recent focus on Rev. Wright presents--to advance our dialogue on race in a meaningful and unprecedented way. To do so, however, we need to appreciate that passion born of difficulty does not always manifest itself in the kind of words with which we are most comfortable. We also need to recognize that the basic goodness of people like Jeremiah Wright is not always packaged conventionally. The problems of race confronting us are immense. But if we sensationalize isolated words for political advantage, casting aside the depth of feeling, circumstances and context which inform them, those problems not only will remain immense, they will be insoluble. William A. Von Hoene Jr. of Chicago is a member of Trinity United Church of Christ. Copyright (c) 2008, Chicago Tribune Comments? Click here
|  |
|
|