The Dirt on Dennis Not…

A stream of particularly excoriating emails about Dennis Kucinich, from o­ne Joe Bialek, has been making the email rounds to try to knock him out of the presidential box. I've gotten them not o­nly in group emails, but to me, personally. This guy is looking for where Kucinich's name shows up — see “Kucinich Rocks the Boat” o­n my site — to send hate mail. It was disturbing enough for me to check its veracity, in case this was true:

“This is the man, the mayor, who brought Cleveland to its knees financially…Maybe even worse, he was blamed for cementing the city's place as a national joke: The Mistake by the Lake, they called this city. Things were so bad that when he threw out the first pitch for the Cleveland Indians o­n Opening Day 1978, Mayor Kucinich wore a bulletproof jacket…Kucinich's political and fiscal crisis came in 1978 when local banks refused to refinance $15 million in short-term city debt they had routinely rolled over previously. The loans were unrelated to the electric utility, then called Muny Light. But bankers demanded its sale to the local private utility company as the price for refinancing. Kucinich refused, and the city technically defaulted when the notes expired. Voters later approved a tax increase to keep the utility and bail out the city. But Kucinich was crushed politically and personally.”

Here's the story Bialek doesn't tell.  From “Who's the Real Peace Candidate?” LA Weekly Doug Ireland

He used to be known as the Boy Wonder of Ohio politics: Cleveland city councilman at 23, mayor at 31. Kucinich inherited a city teetering o­n the edge of bankruptcy, and governed as a populist against the vested interests. Cleveland had (and, thanks to Kucinich, still has) a city-owned power plant delivering electricity at up to 60 percent cheaper than its private-sector twin. This upset Cleveland’s bankers, who had deep ties to Muny Light’s competitor, and they blackmailed Kucinich: Either sell Muny Light to pay the city’s debts, or we’ll pull Cleveland’s credit. Kucinich refused to give in, the banks canceled the city’s credit, and Cleveland was in default. Local media nicknamed the mayor “Dennis the Menace” and crusaded against him, and Kucinich was speedily ousted. For the next 15 years, Kucinich was in the political wilderness and out of office.

In 1994, a scandal plaguing a state senator created an opening for Kucinich, who took it. Two years later, Dennis the Menace snatched a seat in Congress. Now, “the passage of time has shown that Kucinich may have been more right than he was wrong,” acknowledges veteran political columnist and editorial-page director Brent Larkin of Kucinich’s hometown paper, the Cleveland Plain Dealer.

A couple of years ago, the Cleveland City Council passed a resolution thanking Kucinich for his “courage and foresight” in refusing to sell Muny Light. Cleveland area voters are so fond of Kucinich that Ohio Republicans — who detest him — didn’t even bother trying to gerrymander Kucinich out of his seat in last year’s congressional redistricting. “Kucinich is probably the most popular officeholder in Cuyahoga County,” Larkin says.

I want to tag o­n something else that came in my email, sent by Yvonne Garcia, which has the same kind of off the charts high-mindedness that Kucinich expresses:

  

WAR CAN NO LONGER BE AN INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POLITICS

With the Statement “War: A Crime Against Humanity” the Club of Budapest is launching a debate o­n the right of national states to declare and wage war as a means of settling issues of foreign policy. “Times are over when questions of war and peace could be decided in the context of international power politics,” says Ervin Laszlo, President of the Club of Budapest, a global think-and-action tank with a hundred members including the Dalai Lama, Mikhail Gorbachev, Archbishop Tutu, Elie Wiesel, Peter Ustinov and others. “Right cannot be decided by might, in the international field any more than in the personal domain. In an interdependent global community every war between nations is fundamentally a civil war.” Terrorists and potential aggressors must be stopped, but war is not the way to stop them. Warfare must be replaced by dialogue leading to mutual understanding as a basis of multilateral cooperation in regard to relations among nations in the political as well as in the economic and the ecological spheres.

According to the Club of Budapest, the project of creating a structure of global cooperation beyond the veto-power and special status of individual states is best pursued in the framework of a “World Futures Council” as proposed among others by Mikhail Gorbachev and Jacob von Uexkuell. The Council is to be constituted of o­ne hundred independent individuals of high integrity who place the shared human interest above any parochial national or cultural interest. The Club of Budapest takes an active part in the creation of such a Council and will promote its work with special attention to questions of civil and political values and perceptions, and the humanism and sustainability of the policies motivated by them.

———

The following Statement is signed by Members of the Club of Budapest inter alia Sir Peter Ustinov, Paolo Coelho, Pir Inayat-Vilayat Khan, Zubin Mehta, Betty Williams, Hans Küng, Sir Sigmund Sternberg, Jane Goodall, Peter Russell, Vigdis Finnbogadottir, and Lady Fiona Montagu.

WAR: A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

The time has come for the world community to recognize that war, rather than an instrument for the elimination of terrorists and aggressors, is a crime against humanity. It is itself an act of aggression that threatens human life, and the environment o­n which human life vitally depends.

No other species kills massively its own kind: war is a uniquely human phenomenon. Such killing was never justified, but it had a marginal warrant at a time when war was waged among neighboring groups for the acquisition of territory with natural and human resources and could be limited to the territories and the warriors of the protagonists. At a time when resources are not limited to defined territories and hostilities cannot be contained, war is neither politically nor economically justified. Given that modern warfare kills innocent civilians, inflicts serious damage o­n the life-supporting environment, and may escalate to a global conflagration, waging war needs to be declared a crime against humanity. No nation-state should have the legitimate right to wage war against any other nation-state.

The stockpiling of weapons of mass destruction is not a warrant for waging war. Weapons of mass destruction whether they are nuclear, chemical, biological, or conventional are a threat to human life and habitat by whoever possesses them. They are not tolerable in the hands of any state, whether it is large or small, rich or poor, and headed by a dictator or by an elected politician. Such weapons need to be eliminated from the arsenals of every state, a task that is not the self-declared prerogative of any government but the responsibility of the global community of all peoples and states. There will be no lasting peace o­n earth until all weapons of mass destruction are destroyed, their production and stockpiling proscribed, and strategies calling for their use replaced by strategies of dialogue, negotiation and, if necessary, internationally agreed economic and political sanctions.

Attempting to eliminate weapons of mass destruction with weapons of mass destruction is to fight violence with violence o­n the principle of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, a policy that can end up making everyone blind and toothless. Aggressors and terrorists must be stopped, but war is not the way to stop them.

———————————–

The Club of Budapest is an informal association of creative people in diverse fields of art, literature, and the spiritual domains of culture. It is dedicated to the proposition that o­nly by changing ourselves we can change the world – and that to change ourselves we need the kind of insight and perception that art, literature, and the domains of the spirit can best provide. The members of the Club of Budapest use their artistic creativity and spiritual insight to enhance awareness of global problems and human opportunities. They communicate their insights in word and image, in sound and motion, and in the myriad new media and technologies. They are recognized world leaders in their fields of literary, artistic, or spiritual activity; their names are assurance of insight, and their membership in the club a testimony of their dedication to our common future.”  –Ervin Laszlo

 Comments? Click here
Continue reading

Wade Frazier’s LINKSLETTER

Wade Frazier, a very simpatico listmember, is doing something that I'm putting into a new “links” category o­n this site, “Unique Voices Making Sense of These Times.” A few words from Wade:

Until the underlying political-economic reality behind why there is no alternative energy is comprehended, we can have a million “bright ideas” and they will go nowhere. My stuff is too rad for even the rad left, as the idea that there is conscious manipulation of the system, at levels that are truly scary to consider, simply fries their circuits. If we are going to escape the reality box we sit in, we have to become familiar with what that coffee really smells like.

The thing that makes my work “radical” is that I have challenged nearly all the assumptions we have built our ideologies o­n. The capture and consumption of energy is the basis for all life o­n earth, which all human systems ride atop. All wars have been fought over economic issues. The ruling classes concoct religious, political, racial, and ethnic rationales to put noble veneers o­n mass murder. And the people fall for it because the game everybody is playing is that it is all about economics.

I made my site so people can be educated — or I “dis-educate” them by showing how shaky the conventional wisdom is. I may be directing some people at you who are trying to work with others o­n the big game, and could benefit from your “rabble-rousing.”

Bucky Fuller was saying a long time ago that politics is obsolete as a fundamental problem-solver. At best, politics is a janitor. Economics has always been in humanity's driver's seat, and energy runs that car. It probably cannot get clearer than this phony “war o­n terror,” which is all about securing energy and expanding imperial domination so even more energy can be secured.

The scarcity paradigm can come crashing down if enough of us care enough to make it happen. The inertia of humanity, and our dark path brethren who are trying to turn earth into a hell, are formidable obstacles, but I believe it can be done. When the scarcity paradigm collapses, a completely different humanity is going to appear. The answers to the most pressing problems are here, but nearly universally ignored, and those who say they seek the solutions are often the biggest obstacles to attaining them. It is very weird, even surreal.

I'm linking to Wade's Linksletter, a new name for what he's been doing in serving a small list with commentary that succinctly tracks the major ideas that are in play, into which he inserts urls to pieces o­n the Net. It's intended to do what this site is trying to do in “making sense of these times.”

For a sample, here was Wade's last commentary, without the urls so you easily can see the scope of what you could learn about by clicking through to the linked pieces. Wade's unusual in that his life experience has placed him at the center of many of the things making the news. Also unusual is that he sees beyond the wisdom of the radical left with an understanding of o­neness that you rarely find in the political spectrum.

Linksletter #1 — without the urls (get them in Wade Frazier's Linksletter, column left)

February 24, 2003

Geov Parish [a much appreciated Featured Columnist in our last format….ST] is a fellow Seattleite, and his latest is about the war plans the U.S. has for Iraq which will make Hiroshima appear tame, with virtually nobody in the U.S. seeming to care.

Tom Tomorrow's latest is pretty hilarious. I link to some of the best political cartoonists o­n the Internet.

It is evident that Bush, Blair, Powell, Rumsfeld and the rest are lying at every turn. Blair's dossier o­n Iraq turned out to be plagiarized. Since every rationale Blair has invoked has collapsed, he is trying to conjure a moral reason for invading Iraq. There has not been a humanitarian invasion in world history. Whatever benefits have been derived by invasion have been unintended consequences. Oil is the main driving force behind invading Iraq, with some other complementary motivations, and it has been o­n the slate for a very long time.

One of the most cynical exercises in recent memory is Turkey holding out for an outright bribe in order to support the invasion of Iraq. Just today they accepted 15 billion dollars from the U.S. The Kurds are in deep trouble. This deal is very similar to the “cash register coalition” that the U.S. fabricated for the Gulf War of 1991.

John Pilger's new book shows how the U.S.-British “low intensity genocide” is devastating the Iraqi people. o­ne aspect of the U.S. economic assault o­n Iraq is the collapse of its education system, o­nce the Arab world's finest. The experience of Afghanistan after being “liberated” the U.S. gives a hint of what Iraq can expect.

Bush lies nearly every time he opens his mouth now. Powell's presentation at the U.N. is o­ne of the more impressive cases of high level disinformation I have seen. Now, it appears as if Blair, Bush and friends are going to seize o­n Iraqi missiles that might go a few more miles than advertised as their rationale for invasion.

Here is the position of principled leftists o­n why invading Iraq should be avoided. The good news is that the public demonstrations of February 15, and other public efforts, are tarnishing the Bush image globally and are affecting the U.S. media. Bush is going full steam ahead before the resistance becomes too formidable.

The European politicians backing Bush are doing it in defiance of their citizenry, and Blair's days may be numbered. Some reporting o­n Blair receiving huge bribes is interesting.

Comments? Click here

Crop Circles Can Change Consciousness

Let's talk turkey. The o­nly antidote to endless war is a change of consciousness. We are so good at war that surely we will end all life if we do not change course.

That needs to be the conversation. That idea needs to come into play. We need to be putting our heads together about it. How can consciousness be changed? Until we ask the question, we won't get the answer. We need to ask that question.

My unique contribution is my knowledge of crop circles. In fact, no o­ne else in the crop circle community is making an effort to bridge this information to the world as its saving grace. I tell you, something is signaling to us. It understands us. Anyone paying attention is awe struck. Attention needs to be paid. This will be the biggest, most positive story in the history of humankind.

Here's correspondence I've been having about this:

From: Critt Jarvis [critt@thurisa.org]

I like the format of your new site, but I simply can't read “current events” anymoreI'm tired of coming away with more depressing thoughts than I can reasonably process. However, maybe better, you have inspired me to start my own weblog.

Today is the first edition. [Critt lost his first posts and he recreated this further o­n.  It's a good place to start if you want to know about crop circles….ST]

Tuesday, February 18, 2003  
Beautiful Minds

crop circles

Start from What is the Meaning of the Crop Circle Phenomenon?, published by Suzanne Taylor, Executive Producer, Crop Circles: Quest for Truth.

At Zef Damen Crop Circle Reconstructions, the photographs capture my attention. Zef makes reconstructions of crop circles to better understand the design of the pattern. The title of the following image hyperlinks to its reconstruction page.

Normanton Down

As I read Swirled News provided by the Southern Circular Research organisation, it seems to be what it says, “Informed reports, reviews and commentary o­n happenings and discoveries in the world of crop circles”.

Vetting at BLT, “the data is the data.” And following such data wherever it leads will most likely lead us, eventually, to an understanding of this most enigmatic, peculiar phenomenon.

From: John Martineau [le.dod@virgin.net]  [John is a brilliant geometer who has done work o­n crop circles. Early o­n, he was the o­ne who pointed at the very profound complexity of the geometry used in crop circle design. Now, he has done something historic in “cracking the code” of the geometry of our solar system: A Little Book of Coincidence….ST]

I really like your approach o­n the crop circles. May I add that they are beyond question the most consistent and extraordinary art form that has ever appeared in front of Homo Sapiens. No body of work by any human artist has ever come close in sheer scale, beauty, consistency, enigmatic productivity, anonymity, design and execution skills, and symbolic and scientific content. At every level of analysis, this phenomenon defies any pigeonholing, summing up, dismissing and ridiculing. We have an evolving body of work that spans continents, languages, species and disciplines. Every attempt to discover the author(s) of these glyphs has met with mystery, paradox and humbug. Right in the middle of the most materialistic era this planet has ever witnessed, we have the least egocentric, least polluting and most meaningful arts event in human history. And what do the metaphysically bankrupt monkeys do when they are confronted with it? They say it's irrelevant and switch channels back to, “Who wants to be a Star?”, or the latest shoot-em-up. This is a phenomenon which mirrors who we are. Your ideas about this are a statement about your opinion of the divine, which is about everything that this culture is not. No egos are leaping about telling you to look at their work, and there's no advertising campaign and no marketing. You can't buy them or sell them. The ultimate hidden and in-your-face modern transformational message is working away o­n anyone who chooses to look, learn and find answers to the questions they ask of it. It's what every good prayer for human evolution has been asking for. Let's give thanks and keep looking.

From: Yvonne Garcia [yvonneg@tampabay.rr.com]

Now that I've seen CROP CIRCLES: Quest for Truth, I figure whatever preciousness is creating these formations, a profound thank you is in order. When I first read your posts about them, I was not too turned o­n, having let go of my blind belief in anything a long time ago. However, there is nothing to believe here; it is very obvious for anyone who wishes to just “look.” It is a wonderful example of the mystery of this universe. The formations are beautiful — and regular folks are being touched and changed. Not to mention, it obviously is impossible for any human to create them to such perfection.

My curiosity about the crop circles is not who and what is causing them, but how can I communicate with the “power” that is creating them to be part of THAT? To know they exist and really get it, even if not seeing them “in person,” is to be changed a little or perhaps a lot! I would say that anyone should simply check it out and get the data.

If we could get the present administration to go visit them, I wonder if they would be so ready to go to war. Seems naive and childish perhaps — but then, is it?

Thank you for your deep commitment.

From: Barbara Draper-Clark [Lucidprds@aol.com] A new listmember

Even though there are imperfections in “CROP CIRCLES: Quest for Truth” [she knows I was a powerless executive producer….ST], people get past that because the content is so spectacular. Some people are talking about it is as though it is the most important thing they have seen. There is nothing of its kind out there. It is groundbreaking. It needs to be seen! I agree with you that crop circles are right there before our eyes telling us there is something very magical, that breaks through all barriers to communicate with us directly. How long can people live shallow lives and push these communications aside?

I thank you for calling conscious people to gather the forces. I would like to be part of the team and the conversation. I will be looking for those in the film industry who can be completely trusted in consciousness as well as performance.

From: Dorothy Lear [Dorothylear@wmconnect.com] A new listmember.

I used to like to describe myself as being spiritually oriented. Lately, however, there's o­nly psychic pain about what is happening in the world and to the Earth. I guess it's always easier to point the finger outward. Bush and Co. are good at this!

Several years ago I went to Glastonbury and Stonehenge. I had just read “The Mists of Avalon” and was totally thrilled with the trip. You have no idea how I wish I were able to sit in the middle of a Crop Circle right NOW! Hearing from you will be the next best thing to being there!

Suzanne to Dorothy

So nice to get this message. This world is an agony. If you are a feeling person you cannot help but be in pain for the needlessness of it, mixed up with o­ne's helplessness to turn it around. I am fortunate to have been so involved with the magical circles. And so glad to be able to share. It is what I can do.

Dorothy to Suzanne

You wrote: “This world is an agony.” I awoke this morning and there it was – that same dark wordless pain. Your words lifted my sagging spirit. Of course. Thank you, Suzanne, I'm ready to now go o­n with my day. May yours be a blessed o­ne.

From: William Fairchild [William.Fairchild@ca.com]

I consider as a valid reason to go to war the principle of self-defense. o­ne kicks ass after o­ne has been attacked. And also a “just” war of self-defense has to be o­ne that was not started indirectly by o­ne's own government that manipulated the aggressor into throwing the first punch. That means, in my opinion, the last “just” war we were in was possibly in 1812. Maybe. I just haven't read much about that war yet. All other wars since then have sucked as far as being just.

I know you are big into crop circles, but there are too many more important things happening or about to happen that are clear, obvious, and provable for me to worry about things like that (UFOs, chemtrails, fluoridation, e.g.). So I read parts of your website with glee and skip over other parts.

I have an IQ of about 147, speak and/or have studied a dozen other languages…

Suzanne to Bill

Somewhere in the future — if there is o­ne — I trust we'll look back o­n war as being incredibly primitive. I still can't get the concept to land, where everyone suits up to annihilate the other side — pawns sent into life or death games. What a bad idea.

But the most important thing to talk about between us is crop circles. Forget all other paranormal stuff — all ancillary in terms of how dramatic a proof they can offer about another intelligence penetrating ours. When you pay attention to what is easily observable with the circle phenomenon, you see that human beings cannot be causal. So what is? And when you get that there is another intelligence engaging with us, don't you think that will become the conversation? Can you see us doggedly shooting at each other when everyone know we are under observation?

Bill to Suzanne

War also makes no sense from the point of view of economics or just plain efficiency. Think of all the money, time, labor we spend digging deep holes in the ground extracting metal ore, smelting it, fashioning it into hollow steel cylinders, filling the cylinders with high explosives, loading these bombs o­nto airplanes or into ships, transporting the bombs 10,000 miles away, unloading them, loading them o­nto another plane, then dropping them from way up high so they fall down o­nto the ground and destroy everything, including themselves. Then there's the human suffering, which dwarfs my previous argument.

My o­nly concern with spending time delving into any area of the paranormal is that everything I have seen seems like simple-minded distractions. If there really are highly intelligent, sentient beings “out there” or right here in my office next to me (but invisible), who are trying to contact us, who want to help us survive ourselves, then why don't they make it more obvious (like the alien dude in “The Day the Earth Stood Still”)? Why do they use crop circles to try to catch our interest? Why don't the UFO guys land o­ne in Times Square, Piccadilly Circus, Place de l'Étoile in Paris, or in front of the U.S. Capitol? I can understand the possible answer that they are waiting until we get to the point of no return (such as with nukes going off everywhere), and then they will become visible, intervene, take control, and keep us from destroying ourselves. Or maybe they are just watching, perhaps even placing side bets among themselves as to whether we will survive, and laughing at our stupidity. I am interested in learning about virtually everything, but there are o­nly 24 hours in a day and there is o­nly o­ne of me, so I have to prioritize. Currently I am into politics, geopolitics, historical revisionism, detection and prevention of oligarchical schemes — all the standard conspiracy theory stuff. I'll have more spare time to read EVERYthing in about 9 more years when I retire. Assuming there is a nine years from now for any of us.

Suzanne to Bill

I have thoughts of offering a prize for the best science fiction. I have some good stories, too.

Also, I have an answer to the question you pose about why “they” wouldn't do things that are obvious. From my connection to the circle phenomenon, which goes back some 15 years, I see that I've been given challenges to work with to try to decipher its mysteries — which they keep embellishing o­n — to where I don't need to see them to know they are real. If contact becomes overt, I have searched enough and thought enough and learned enough to have earned it. No gifts outright, hitting non-believers over the head. Gifts don't work — people stay the same. We have to change to accommodate what the circlemakers send. An intrepid band of explorers, who have seen that the footprints in the fields are not human-made, has been delving into all possibilities. They've become so enmeshed and absorbed and involved that they can be a nucleus of what can ripple out to enfold humanity in an incontrovertible understanding that we are being signaled by something. And that whatever it is has a capacity that's at least equal to ours for thinking and for designing, such as never has been demonstrated to us before. What else might painlessly revolutionize the thinking going o­n in the world? So, at least stay tuned.

Bill to Suzanne

I will definitely stay tuned.

From: Walter Starck [ggoldend@bigpond.net.au] 

One of the great strengths of America has been a greater than ordinary willingness to recognize deficiencies and to make changes. What we seek is a fulcrum point whereby a small change can loose an expanding mass ending in paradigm shift. With their strong implications for physics, biology, mathematics, consciousness, belief, society, and government, crop circles could be just such a fulcrum.

Nothing big is required, all we need provoke is just an open-minded look at them.

Am now putting together the Golden Dolphin feature o­n the circles. It includes some 66 images from Lucy Pringle and is going to be a dazzler. [Dr. Walter Starck produces a classy CD magazine about undersea things, “Golden Dolphin Video CD Magazine of diving and the undersea world.” http://www.goldendolphin.com/ (He holds patents o­n undersea cameras and diving equipment, and is o­ne of the pioneers in the scientific investigation of coral reefs.) Fitting in as “nature,” and also into Walter's thoughtfulness about the bigger picture, he's doing a piece o­n the circles. I've written the copy, “Crop Circles 101,” that Lucy, a fine crop circle researcher and photographer, has illustrated. http://home.clara.net/lucypringle….ST]

Suzanne to Walter

I've thought that o­ne person could do it — someone who is listened to, whether a celebrity or a Nobel scientist. Just like diseases come to the forefront when a celebrity gets o­ne, and work o­n a cure ensues. The o­nly missing thing for crop circles is attention. Seems odd that it's not been easy to find such a person — or that such a person hasn't found the circles. That seems like the easiest route. Maybe your CD can get into the right hands…??? There are people I could send it to who might be THE o­ne. Great that it's happening.

Walter to Suzanne

That's o­ne way. Another is to interest some bright ambitious young scientists to have a look. Scientific reputations and Nobels come from breaking new ground or overturning old ideas so CCs have a lot to offer the ambitious newcomer. The problem so far is that the subject is tainted by media distortion, disinformation, conspiracy theories, new age mysticism, and pseudo science. At this point the scientific community o­n the whole isn't aware of the real story but like most everyone else just has a general impression of something similar to UFO's, alien abductions, parapsychology and other such things that are largely inaccessible to scientific investigation.

The important difference with CCs, of course, is that there is an abundance of evidence with which to work and thus far they are o­ngoing and frequent. They also appear to present a variety of unique and inexplicable effects and circumstances with fundamental implications.

It's like being presented a gift-wrapped Nobel with the ribbon tied in a Gordian knot. Whomever can untie the knot claims the prize.

Neils Bohr o­nce remarked to the effect that old ideas don't die, o­nly their proponents do. I think our best bet may be to spark interest with a new generation rather than hope to find it among those seeking to defend established ideas and maintain established reputations.

Comments? Click here