INSIDE STORY

This piece goes a ways to redeem National Geographic for a misguided program about the crop circle phenomenon that runs repeatedly o­n their cable channel. In the March issue of National Geographic Adventure, this personal account of the writer's trips to Peru to ingest a hallucinogenic substance, which comes from the perspective of it being about healing rather than hurting, is a very good thing indeed.

Ayahuasca is in wide use in the States (I don’t know about the rest of the world). I think of it as this era's LSD, although it's always taken under guidance, either with South American shamans or with people who have been trained by shamans from any of several South American countries, where some of its usage is in religious ritual. (There's a case to allow its sacramental use by a New Mexico branch of the Brazilian Uniao do Vegetal Church that has made it to the Supreme Court, and, in February, with Roberts presiding, the Court ruled 8-0 to let the usage continue while the ultimate conclusion is being reached — a so-far great victory!)

This is the first page of four, and if you get o­n the site you'll see that it just gets better as it goes further off the charts with insights into the human psyche and the fierce and glorious battle to be waged for personal freedom. In this society, where there is much yearning to cleanse dysfunction and considerable meditating and praying in quest of inner peace, ayahuasca affords a rocket ride to what's beyond our 3-D reality shell. This is o­ne of the best things I've ever read about journeying — for how well it's written, how courageous the writer is, and what it taught me about what is possible. I hope you find it as valuable as I did.

Peru: Hell and Back

Deep in the Amazon jungle, writer Kira Salak tests ayahuasca, a shamanistic medicinal ritual, and finds a terrifying—but enlightening—world within.

Page o­ne:

For centuries, Amazonian shamans have used ayahuasca as a window into the soul. The sacrament, they claim, can cure any illness. The author joins in this ancient ritual and finds the worlds within more terrifying—and enlightening—than ever imagined.

I will never forget what it was like. The overwhelming misery. The certainty of never-ending suffering. No o­ne to help you, no way to escape. Everywhere I looked: darkness so thick that the idea of light seemed inconceivable.

Suddenly, I swirled down a tunnel of fire, wailing figures calling out to me in agony, begging me to save them. Others tried to terrorize me. “You will never leave here,” they said. “Never. Never.”

I found myself laughing at them. “I'm not scared of you,” I said. But the darkness became even thicker; the emotional charge of suffering nearly unbearable. I felt as if I would burst from heartbreak—everywhere, I felt the agony of humankind, its tragedies, its hatreds, its sorrows. I reached the bottom of the tunnel and saw three thrones in a black chamber. Three shadowy figures sat in the chairs; in the middle was what I took to be the devil himself.

“The darkness will never end,” he said. “It will never end. You can never escape this place.”

“I can,” I replied.

All at o­nce, I willed myself to rise. I sailed up through the tunnel of fire, higher and higher until I broke through to a white light. All darkness immediately vanished. My body felt light, at peace. I floated among a beautiful spread of colors and patterns. Slowly my ayahuasca vision faded. I returned to my body, to where I lay in the hut, insects calling from the jungle.

“Welcome back,” the shaman said.

The next morning, I discovered the impossible: The severe depression that had ruled my life since childhood had miraculously vanished.

Giant blue butterflies flutter clumsily past our canoe. Parrots flee higher into treetops. The deeper we go into the Amazon jungle, the more I realize I can't turn back. It has been a year since my last visit, and I'm here again in Peru traveling down the Río Aucayacu for more shamanistic healing. The truth is, I'm petrified to do it a second time around. But with shamanism—and with the drinking of ayahuasca in particular—I've learned that, for me, the worse the experience, the better the payoff. There is o­nly o­ne requirement for this work: You must be brave. You'll be learning how to save yourself.

The jungle camp where our shamanistic treatment will take place is some 200 miles (322 kilometers) from the nearest town, Iquitos, deep in the Peruvian Amazon. Beside me are the other four members of my tour. There is Winston, the biggest person I've ever met. Nearly seven feet tall (two meters), surely over 400 pounds (181 kilograms), he has a powerful body that could easily rip someone apart. I expect him to be a bodyguard or a bouncer; turns out he's a security guard. But there is something else about him. Something less tangible. It seems to rest in the black circles beneath his eyes, the face that never smiles, the glances that immediately dismiss all they survey. Winston does not seem like a happy man.

Then the others: Lisa, who has a master's degree from Stanford and is now pursuing her doctorate in political theory at Duke University; Christy, who just quit her job counseling at-risk teens to travel around South America; and Katherine, Christy's British friend. By all appearances, our group seems to be composed of ordinary citizens. No New Age energy healers. No pan flute makers. No hippies or Rastafarians or nouveau Druids. Christy betrays o­nly a passing interest in becoming a yoga instructor.

And then there is me, who a year ago came to Peru o­n a lark to take the “sacred spirit medicine,” ayahuasca, and get worked over by shamans. Little suspecting that I'd emerge from it feeling as if a waterlogged wool coat had been removed from my shoulders—literally feeling the burden of depression lifted—and thinking that there must be something to this crazy shamanism after all.

And so I am back again.

I've told no o­ne this time—especially not my family. I grew up among fundamentalist atheists who taught me that we're all alone in the universe, the fleeting dramas of our lives culminating in a final, ignoble end: death. Nothing beyond that. It was not a prescription for happiness, yet, for the first couple decades of my life, I became prideful and arrogant about my atheism, believing that I was o­ne of the rare few who had the courage to face life without the “crutches” of religion or, worse, such outrageous notions as shamanism. But for all of my overweening rationality, my world remained a dark, forbidding place beyond my control. And my mortality gaped at me mercilessly. Lisa shakes me from my reveries, asking why I've come back to take another tour with the shamans.

“I've got some more work to do,” I say. Hers is a complicated question to answer. And especially personal. Lord knows I didn't have to come back. I could have been content with the results of my last visit: no more morbid desires to die. Waking up o­ne morning in a hut in the sultry jungles of Peru, desiring o­nly to live.

Still, even after those victories I knew there were some stubborn enemies hiding out in my psyche: Fear and Shame. They were taking potshots at my newfound joy, ambushing my successes. How do you describe what it's like to want love from another but to be terrified of it at the same time? To want good things to happen to you, while some disjointed part of you believes that you don't deserve them? To look in a mirror and see o­nly imperfections? This was the meat and potatoes of my several years of therapy. Expensive therapy. Who did what, when, why. The constant excavations of memory. The sleuth-work. Patching together theory after theory. Rational-emotive behavioral therapy. Gestalt therapy. Humanistic therapy. Biofeedback. Positive affirmations. I am a beautiful person. I deserve the best in life.

Then, there's the impatience. Thirty-three years old already, for chrissakes. And in all that time, after all that therapy, o­nly o­ne thing worked o­n my depression—an ayahuasca “cleansing” with Amazonian shamans.

For pages 2-4 get o­n the website:

http://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/0603/features/peru.html
Continue reading

The truth would be a start to setting us free.

As you'll read in Stop Bush's War, “Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently told Tim Russert that things were going 'very, very well' in Iraq.” I've been preoccupied of late with some family matters, so when I heard that March 5th, while I was listening to Meet the Press, as o­nly o­ne statement the General made in a long upbeat report about Iraq, I wondered if there was some chance, somehow, some way, very very strange but true, that I had slipped away from a realistic understanding of what is going o­n. I mean, how could General Pace have been speaking so positively and Russert not be appalled at what he was saying if things were as I thought they were? But, no such luck. The inmates still are running the asylum.

I can barely read any more run-downs by eloquent writers who tell essentially the same depressing tales about Iraq. However, Stop Bush's War got me. For my sensibilities, Bob Herbert caught it just right. After you are thoroughly radicalized, which many of us have been for a long time, then what? How do we move out of our dualistic perspective in which we are so oppositional to where we  appreciate our mutuality  and start thinking as a planet? For a place to start, I'd get every person of influence to sign o­nto being in agreement with Herbert. You've got to acknowledge a problem in order to go to work o­n it; to get us out of this war conundrum, the first step is for the Administration to admit we are in it. This piece calls for that so compellingly that I wonder if a chorus of every thinking person harmonized in support of it — a doable exercise, given the Net — might force the Administration to change its crazed tune.

Stop Bush's War

By BOB HERBERT

NY Times Op-Ed: March 16, 2006

“By some estimates,” according to a recent article in Foreign Affairs, “the number of Iraqis who have died as a result of the [U.S.] invasion has reached six figures – vastly more than have been killed by all international terrorists in all of history. Sanctions o­n Iraq probably were a necessary cause of death for an even greater number of Iraqis, most of them children.”

Not everyone agrees that Iraqi deaths have reached six figures. President Bush gave an estimate of 30,000 not too long ago. That's probably low, but horrendous nevertheless. In any event, there is broad agreement that the number of Iraqis slaughtered has reached into the tens of thousands. An ocean of blood has been shed in Mr. Bush's mindless war, and there is no end to this tragic flow in sight. Jeffrey Gettleman of The Times gave us the following chilling paragraphs in Tuesday's paper:

“In Sadr City, the Shiite section in Baghdad where the [four] terrorist suspects were executed, government forces have vanished. The streets are ruled by aggressive teenagers with shiny soccer jerseys and machine guns.

“They set up roadblocks and poke their heads into cars and detain whomever they want. Mosques blare warnings o­n loudspeakers for American troops to stay out. Increasingly, the Americans have been doing just that.”

Everyone who thought this war was a good idea was wrong and ought to admit it. Those who still think it's a good idea should get therapy.

Last Friday and Saturday, a conference titled “Vietnam and the Presidency” was held at the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston. Discussions about the lessons we failed to learn from Vietnam, and thus failed to apply to Iraq, were pervasive.

Some of the lessons seemed embarrassingly basic. Jack Valenti, who served as a special assistant to Lyndon Johnson, reminded us how difficult it is to “impress democracy” o­n other countries. And he noted something that the public and the politicians seem to forget each time the glow of a brand-new war is upon us: that wars are “inhumane, brutal, callous and full of depravity.”

Think Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo. Think suicide bombers and death squads and roadside bombs. Think of the formerly healthy men and women who have come back to the United States from Iraq paralyzed, or without their arms or legs or eyes, or the full use of their minds. Think of the many thousands dead.

Most of the people who thought this war was a good idea also thought that the best way to fight it was with other people's children. That in itself is a form of depravity.

Among those who played a key role in the conference was David Halberstam, the author of “The Best and the Brightest,” which is not just the best book about America's involvement in Vietnam, but a book that grows more essential with each passing year. If you read it in the 70's or 80's, read it again. We can all use a refresher course o­n the link between folly and madness at the highest levels of government, and the all-but-unimaginable suffering it can unleash.

In the book's epilogue, Mr. Halberstam wrote that, among other things, President Johnson “and the men around him wanted to be defined as being strong and tough; but strength and toughness and courage were exterior qualities which would be demonstrated by going to a clean and hopefully antiseptic war with a small nation, rather than the interior and more lonely kind of strength and courage of telling the truth to America and perhaps incurring a good deal of domestic political risk.”

That latter kind of toughness is what's needed now. Invading Iraq was a disastrous move by the Bush administration, and there is no satisfactory solution forthcoming. The White House should be working cooperatively with members of both parties in Congress to figure out the best way to bring the curtain down o­n U.S. involvement.

Before that can begin to happen, the administration will have to rid itself of the delusion that things are somehow going well in Iraq. The democracy that was supposed to flower in the Iraqi desert and then spread throughout the Middle East was as much a mirage as the weapons of mass destruction.

President Bush continues to assert that our goal in Iraq is “victory.” Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, recently told Tim Russert that things were going “very, very well” in Iraq.

They are still crawling toward the mirage. It's time to give reality a chance.

Continue reading