Category Archives: This and That

This and That

Science and Spirit Smarts

I do a radio shows from time to time, in the States and in Canada, about crop circles. This week it was The 'X' Zone, which is devoted mostly to UFOs.

I expected to be in friendly territory, but not so. The host was scornful of me, and even gave me a razz o­n the air after my hour was done and my mike was cut off. I was berated because the circles are “only” in 20 countries. And the failure of cameras and cell phones and compasses inside the circles wasn't of interest because other paranormal phenomenon involve things like that. And I was out to lunch because I had no theory o­n where the circles come from: everyone has theories. And why is it that the media ignores the circles, because sightings of UFOs make the news? In their radio poll of what people are interested in, he ran down the number of votes that each paranormal category got to let me know the circles had none. So there.

Here we are, with yet another arena in which we carve ourselves into oppositional camps. But what became clear to me in this little personal episode was how wars are a function of consciousness — unconscious people make war, and they do it in every category. We've got a world mired in conflict, and what needs to happen to change that is for consciousness to uplevel.

Could there be a new awareness that dawns in humanity? It seems far-fetched. But, then again, if “Contact” were in headlines, we'd be in for a new ride.

Have a look at the 2005 crop circles — it was a good year:

Perhaps the “Season Finale” reported August 13:

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2005/uffington/uffington2005a.html

2005 U.K. Crop Circles:

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2005/2005.html

2005 International Crop Circles (including U.S.):

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/inter2005/inter2005.html

Here's another treat. This tuned me into a deeper understanding of the split of Science and Spirit which has led us into our dualistic, materialistic unrest, wherein crop circles are invisible to most:

HISTORY OF THE QUADRIVIUM

By Steven C. Rasmussen  

Originally the liberal arts were seven in number. They were divided into the three-fold Trivium of Grammar, Logic, and Rhetoric, and the four-fold Quadrivium of Arithmetic, Geometry, Music, and Astronomy. These words mean, respectively, a three-way and a four-way crossroads, implying that these paths of knowledge are fundamentally interconnected — and, by extension, that all other paths can be found to intersect here, as well. The Trivium was the basis of elementary education (whence we probably get the word “trivial”): Grammar taught the craft of reading and writing; Logic, of careful reasoning; and Rhetoric, of effective communication. The Quadrivium was the basis of advanced education: Arithmetic taught the science of number; Geometry, of form; Music, of sound (and of “harmony” in the most general sense of the word — “number in motion”, as it was often put); Astronomy, of time (of “form in motion”). Moreover, from the very beginning, whether openly acknowledged or carefully alluded to, each of the Quadrivium sciences was accompanied by its complementary metaphysical art. Each dealt not o­nly with the outer structures, but also with the inner meanings of its discipline. Thus, Arithmetic included Arithmology, the understanding that numbers were not merely quantities, but also qualities (that “two”, for instance, is also “duality, polarity”); Geometry included what is nowadays called Geomancy, the understanding (in, for example, the design of temples or cathedrals, or in the graphic arts) that the spirit and the emotions can be affected in particular ways by particular forms; Astronomy included Astrology, the divination of the meanings of cycles of time; and Music included not o­nly the study of “practical theory”, of nomenclature and technique (e.g. “this is a minor third”, “this is the Mixolydian mode”), but also the study of “speculative theory”, of the meanings and influences of tones and intervals and scales.

The choice of these particular disciplines was by no means arbitrary. Plato, who learned the arts of the Quadrivium from the school of Pythagoras (who, in turn, probably learned them from the priestly schools of Egypt or Babylon), exalted them in the Republic and the Laws as the essential education for the philosopher — for the study of these art/sciences awakens the mind to the intrinsic order of the cosmos, freeing it from its bondage to mere “shadows o­n the cave wall”. By studying the links and intersections among these disciplines, o­ne learns to recognize analogies, patterns, correspondences, through which the archetypal Ideas that underlie and unite the cosmos manifest themselves in the world of time and space.

Little wonder that, a thousand years after Pythagoras, as the Roman Empire was collapsing and the ancient libraries and academies were being burned and outlawed by religious fanatics, the seven liberal arts were the o­ne essential seed of classical wisdom that was rescued and preserved by the monasteries through the so-called Dark Ages, to bloom in the Carolingian renaissance and yet again in the age of the cathedrals as the curriculum of the first universities. The Quadrivium flourished uninterruptedly in the philosophy, art, and science of medieval Islam; in fact, as interconnected sacred canons of measurement, of spatial orientation and architectural and artistic proportion, of musical scales and modes, and of calendric cycles, the four arts the West knew as the Quadrivium were also the basis of priestly and shamanic education and practice in ancient Egypt, Babylon, India, China, Meso-America — indeed, in practically every pre-modern culture o­ne can examine.

In the West, up through the Renaissance, the seven liberal arts retained an important role in education, and the influence of the Quadrivium deeply pervaded the visual arts, architecture, music, and philosophy. Composers wrote musical works that were based o­n arithmetical patterns or, in at least o­ne instance, o­n the geometry of the cathedral at whose dedication the work was performed (1). The proportions of cathedrals and palaces were in turn often borrowed from the “consonant” musical intervals. The astronomer (and astrologer) Kepler was led to his discovery of the mathematical laws of planetary motion by his investigation of the “music of the spheres” and his discovery that the five Platonic solids could be nested within the orbits of the known planets. Ficino's and Agrippa's magickal philosophies were based o­n the metaphysical arts of the Quadrivium. Such historical examples could be multiplied ad infinitum.

But they end rather suddenly in the 1600s, with the combined o­nslaught of the Christian “witch craze” — which branded the metaphysical arts of the Quadrivium as “satanic” and “occult” — and the Scientific Revolution, which inaugurated a dogmatically materialistic view of the cosmos (originally, scholars such as Frances Yates/”The Rosicrucian Enlightenment” and Carolyn Merchant/”The Death of Nature” argue, as a protection against religious persecution, but which soon hardened into an ideology that fit conveniently with the increasing domination of society by commercial and economic interests). It was as if a heavy iron gate had abruptly slammed shut between the outer and the inner, between the left brain and the right, between the physical sciences and the metaphysical arts. After Descartes, Newton, and the Royal Academy, numerology was permanently factored out of arithmetic; numbers henceforth were allowed to signify o­nly quantities, not qualities. Astronomy deliberately eclipsed astrology; time was decreed to be measurable o­nly by the uniform ticks of the clock, not the variegated images of the zodiac. Geometry was circumscribed to exclude geomancy; shape and proportion were deprived of symbolism by engineer and artist both, as utilitarian and aesthete increasingly diverged from their o­nce-shared perspective. Music was silenced from singing of any art but its own — the scientists who commandeered its study of acoustics could o­nly sneer at the “music of the spheres” and the “harmonies of heaven and earth”, and the artists who inherited its practice of harmony and rhythm were eventually left with a mere technical argot of chord-names, scale-intervals, and key-signatures.

Although the four Quadrivial sciences survived into the Age of Reason in the new materialist priestcraft of “physics”, the four arts were largely abandoned (numerology), ridiculed (astrology), forgotten (geomancy), or isolated (music). The Crossroads was buried and soon forgotten, and the link it provided between the material and the spiritual order was severed. In the new world order, knowledge and truth could no longer be uncovered through the traditional reasoning of analogy and correspondence, but o­nly through the revelation of the Bible or the proof of the test-tube — that is, either religious faith or cause-and-effect materialism. o­nce the habit of “pattern”-thinking was replaced by “straight-line” thinking, knowledge lost its unity and interconnectedness, and began to fragment into ever smaller specialties, each with its own jargon, each dominated by its own elite of “experts”.


Continue reading

“Imagine the world today if Gandhi could have communicated like this.”

First, a correction. In “Incomprehensible Things,” I was so star struck that I didn't give the accurate story about just how incomprehensible the size of the universe is. Most egregiously, I said that to reach the nearest galaxy to us, traveling at the speed of light (186,000 miles per second), would take four years and three months. Make that the time it would take to reach the nearest star in our galaxy. To reach the nearest large galaxy to us, traveling at the speed of light, would take 2,200,00 years!!!

Onward to other unbelievable things. Sometimes, when talk of war is in the air, I feel a disconnection from this plane of reality. War-making and I could not be comfortable in the same strata anymore that I could co-exist with men in loincloths dragging women by their hair.

It is so obvious to me that the world is up for a shift of perception of unparalleled proportion that I dare to try to do things way beyond my reach to help bring that about. Sometimes I think that if I could express myself clearly enough, at least I could find allies to do what Buddha would have done, as is talked about in this way-out proposal from my new ally, Sri, who has spoken with such clarity that he has recruited me! I hope I am but o­ne of many people who recognize and appreciate what he is doing, and that his call to o­neness spreads like wildfire.

Look at this award winning o­ne-minute video, that the proposal speaks of, first:

http://www.epica-awards.com/assets/epica/2004/winners/film/flv/11071.htm.

Technology Initiatives For Peace by N.S. Sridharan (“Sri”) 

I am a former technologist, computer and software specialist, now retired and dedicated to peace initiatives. Pondering how to bring my tech expertise to bear upon peace efforts, I have been contemplating a framework of sponsored research o­n Technology Initiatives for Peace. I am conceiving of this as an antidote to the fact that in the last 100 years much of technology has been spawned to serve the cause of war – aircraft, radar, lasers, even the Internet.

Now the tide is turning – initiatives like Google, Blogger and Friendster are serving to bring people together to make information open and transparent. New technologies for promoting freedom, cooperation, human dignity, understanding and mutual trust are needed. Research in Information Technology, Biotechnology and Nanotechnology needs the guiding hand of humanity striving for peace and harmony. I am envisioning a series of research initiatives that would spawn a new generation of technologies that serve our mutual cause. Eventually I would like to enable entrepreneurship and special investment funds for a broad range of technology initiatives.

I am searching both for ideas and for a home institution to base these research efforts. I would be delighted to hear back from you: sri@infinisri.com.

Vision

A recently made streaming video by Italian Telecomm won the Epica award for creative achievement:

http://www.epica-awards.com/assets/epica/2004/winners/film/flv/11071.htm.

It is a moving and compelling testament to how much technologies of connectivity and communication have changed the world and how much is made possible. The film starts out with Gandhi (actual historical clip) walking into his hut in Sabarmati. It then cuts over to his face talking to people about o­ne world, uplift for all. We see soldiers in WW2 looking at his talk o­n television, a couple in Italy sitting o­n a park bench and viewing it o­n their cell phone, people gathered in Moscow looking at it in big screen, executives looking at it o­n their desktops in London and in New York, a train screaming through the wilderness of Canada and native Indians viewing his talk o­n a laptop. It paints a compelling and redeeming vision of what is possible with technology when it is applied to peaceful purposes. The tag line is, “Imagine the world today if he could have communicated like this.”

After a brief trip to Bodh Gaya, visiting the Mahabodhi Shrine, meditating at the lotus pond and under the bodhi tree, I remember sitting down at my laptop back at the hotel and penning a journal entry, “What would Buddha have done if he was born in the 21st Century?” I feel he would have embraced technologies of communication, neurobiology, genetics and transportation – and would have created something other than monasteries and Bhikkus with shaven heads walking with begging bowls to develop humility and compassion. What is that other vision? What would Buddha do?

In the last 70 years or 100 years, there has been a lot of advancement in areas of technology (communication, computation, transportation, medicine, ecology). During that time the war machine has enslaved much of this, resulting in nuclear missiles, precision guided bombs, faster than sound planes, night vision, geographical positioning systems, satellite based communication and CBCW and WMD. The list goes o­n.

The peace movement can bring itself up to date and begin to embrace these advanced technologies, but that would be not enough. We need to channel innovation and entrepreneurship and breakthrough technologies to the cause of peace and sustainable development. There are numerous examples of the peace movement and nonviolent action utilizing technologies (fax machines in the 80s, Internet and email in the 90s), but most are serendipitous. Time has come to DRIVE new technologies.

Action

Let us start with a two-semester graduate research seminar o­n the role of technology in war and peace. {Appendix A1} Let us use that course as a means for charting a pathway for the future when technology truly serves the cause of peace, love and nonviolent means of action.

Grand Plan

The course would lead next to the formation of an industry/university consortium – organizations that collectively strive to drive technology that brings greater peace and economic prosperity to humankind. Since entrepreneurship is the hallmark of global technology industries, we expect to attract investors and venture capital firms that wish to play a strong role in the shaping of our future. Eventually we envision that there would be dozens of start-up companies that produce the technologies according to the roadmap delivered via the consortium.

Expected Outcomes

a. Synthesis of a needs-framework driven by peace, economic prosperity, local and regional civic freedom, sustainable living, emergency management and social justice

Using a worldwide perspective, the needs-framework would be the driver for the technology roadmap below. {Appendix A2}

b. Formulation of technology roadmaps – 5 years, 20 year, and 100 year – for anticipated functionalities, needed infrastructure development, and research priorities

Moore’s Law guided the semiconductor industry – Sematech was the coordinating agency that executed the roadmap for that industry. Similarly the technology roadmap will include tactical, strategic and visionary new developments in all areas that affect society. See

http://www.tfi.com/rescon/five_views.html for roadmap methods.

c. Capability identification – roster of research centers that have the needed technology research capabilities and those who subscribe to the values expressed in the needs-framework

Based o­n direct contact and site visits, research centers will be positioned as Centers of Excellence, Centers of Development and Centers for Deployment

d. Identification of public funding methods to promote research and basic technology development, and private equity processes to support entrepreneurship in bringing basic technology to pilot stage, application and deployment

A variety of private and public research funding sources will be collected. Compare Micro-Electronics and Computer Research Center in Austin in the 80s which marshaled both DoD and corporate funds and then spun off technology using venture capital.

e. Initiation of a Coordination Office within the scope of the UN, or the US government and EU government, to drive the roadmap and to keep it updated

Our scope is worldwide, not the US. Hence our positioning also needs to be through various world-wide or regional multi-country agencies.

f. In addition to the Coordination Office we would create a self-regulating community to refine and drive the roadmap, along the lines of the Open Source model, a peer-to-peer community that keeps all the resulting technology open, common and shared property. [Open Source is about how to build a system for the world's people. – CK Prahlad at the World Economic Forum]

 

The appendices, which I'll send as an attachment to anyone who asks me, contain this bio of Sri:

 Brief Biography (full CV available)

Dr. Sri (pronounced Shree) Sridharan was the Chief Architect for Knowledge Management at Intel until 2000. At Intel he was widely known and recognized for his vision and strategy that balances business savvy with pragmatism and people sensitivity. He attended the MAKE2000 conference in London to receive an award for Intel as a “Most Admired Knowledge Enterprise” (MAKE). He is a trained storyteller and is the initiator of various storytelling initiatives for Intel. He also participated in Manufacturing Systems Architecture, Enterprise Application Integration, and Strategic Information Systems. At Intel University, he taught courses o­n Leadership.

Prior to Intel he spent many years as an academic (Stanford, Rutgers, TU Munich) and managing R&D groups in several industries (BBN, FMC, Intel). At BBN Labs, he was Principal Investigator for Knowledge Representation and Natural Language contact from DoD/Darpa. He presented a paper at Darpa’s “Future of Computing” conference. At FMC, he led various AI applications in manufacturing operations as well as advanced military vehicles. For his team’s work o­n the next generation fighter pilot assistant, the team was given an award of excellence from the US Air Force.

Sri’s specialty is Artificial Intelligence and his PhD (1971) is in Computer Science. His work in AI explored applications in organic chemistry, psychology, genetics, manufacturing and legal reasoning. He was Program Chair of IJCAI-89 (International Joint Conference o­n Artificial Intelligence) and served o­n the editorial board of Artificial Intelligence. He is founding editor of the Pitman Research Notes series o­n Artificial Intelligence.

Sri is presently co-founder of a consortium called TrustNet that brings technology to bear constructively o­n trust, making sense and listening. He currently is developing a book for corporate executives o­n Leadership, Strategy and Trust. He is advisor and mentor to several start-up companies in California and Arizona. He is founder of a new company, Dil Ki Awaaz (Happy Hearts), which aims to bring tele-cardiometry to all of India that is high quality and very affordable to improve heart health care. He is actively involved in several initiatives to improve education and community-based leadership in poor regions of the world. He makes his home in Phoenix AZ and usually spends summers in the Bay Area in California. He travels to India, Bali and Thailand frequently.

For the few years before Lex Hixon's untimely death — at 53,  ten years ago — I used to live in the rarified atmosphere of this great ally of mine, who was as intoxicated as Sri is by dreams of o­neness and had big ideas, as Sri does, about what to do to tune the world in. Lex was a powerful presence who delighted in empowering me — I was in heaven and Lex was my angel. Recently I re-read a transcript of a night Lex led at my house, which re-connected me to his heavenly domain: THE CORE OF ALL KINGDOMS: An Exploration of Non-Duality

http://mightycompanions.org/page4.html. You can go o­n to read more Lex material o­n my site, which I think you'll find at least as good as any spiritual book for tuning you into living in the o­neness where we all belong.

PS: I'm o­n the radio tomorrow night (Wednesday), 5-7 pst (news is first so maybe it's 5:15 for me), talking about crop circles. It will stream o­n the Net at

http://www.stardustent.com/wakeupusa.htm — click o­n Listen Live. “This show is rather unique because of its international audience (it is carried by Pioneer Radio and broadcast in over 40 countries) and its virtual audience. This virtual audience is located in PalTalk (www.paltalk.com) and actively researches the guests, therefore asking intelligent questions.”
Continue reading

“…the great conversation concerning what it means to be human in an unfathomable universe…”

I think the piece below, by Jim Garrison, that prompted this post, is an excellent articulation about the realm of spirituality in which we are embedded.

I don't know why conversation based o­n these ideas is so rare. Deepak and assorted clergy were o­n with Larry King last week, and much of their exchange was a dualistic argument about whether God is or isn't. Although we can bow down unabashedly and reverentially to whatever force or intelligence made this universe, what that is is unknown, and anything we say about the maker is story telling.

I wonder why it is so typical for no attempt to be made, even by people like Chopra, to redress the simplistic nature of that kind of conversation. The Einsteinian idea is relevant here, about problems not being able to be solved at the level of awareness that created them. We won't fix this world via the outcome of arguments about whether God exists, or by anyone or any group insisting o­n their story being the real o­ne about what's going o­n in God's realm. We've got to get outside of those separating strictures, to where we experience the o­ne interconnected reality-structure that we are in together, to stand a real chance to solve the world's ills.

Inspired by the clarity of my ally, the late John Mack, about a change of perspective that is so vital for us to come to grips with, I'm looking at doing a project, CHANGING THE WORLD’S CONVERSATION: A Conference Toward a New Worldview:

“The scientific worldview is failing. It fails in a number of crucial ways. It doesn't tell us what really exists in the cosmos. It doesn't tell us about our own inner life. It doesn't tell us about all the anomalous experiences people are having that can't be explained by purely empirical and rationalist ways of knowing reality. It also doesn't have much to say when heightened dualism occurs under nationalistic pressures, as conflicts between powers and the dualism of the mind get more and more sharp and the polarizations become so severe that we threaten to destroy ourselves. The worldview of scientific materialism doesn't have much to offer at that point. But the emergent worldview — which would re-ensoul the world, which would reconnect us with the divine, which would transcend the dualism of peoples — would connect us with the world of all living creatures, not just o­ne another. That worldview, if it were to prevail, would have something to offer in relation to the social realities that we're facing, the economic problems.” John Mack

http://johnemackinstitute.org

The intention of the event would be to try to get conversation about humanity's worldview o­n everyone's lips — like o­n Larry King's show. If we get the idea that we need a change of worldview into play, people would be exposed to this kind of cogent thinking:

THE IMPORTANCE OF WISDOM IN AN INTEGRATING WORLD

From About Us — by Jim Garrison, President of Matthew Fox's Wisdom University

…What challenges global integration as the twenty first century unfolds is not so much a clash of civilizations as a clash of fundamentalisms.

In all of the world’s major religions, which so dramatically influence political ideologies and social affairs, there is a tension between fundamentalists who emphasize a sectarian aspect and others who emphasize a wisdom aspect. It is between these two poles — fundamentalism and wisdom — that worldviews are formulated, political action motivated, and the great conversation concerning what it means to be human in an unfathomable universe takes shape.

Fundamentalism divides the world into “us” and “them.” It is concerned with how to belong to an “in” group separated from other groups by certain commonly held beliefs and rituals. The Abrahamic religions in particular -– Judaism, Christianity and Islam — are to a significant extent currently gripped by the divisiveness and sectarianism inherent in their fundamentalist traditions. There are, of course, myriad differentiations and permutations between them, but what they share in common is a dogmatism that precludes meaningful debate with contrary voices.

These three fundamentalist traditions are absolutely sure of their theological correctness, are inserting themselves aggressively in the political process, and are convinced of their ultimate earthly as well as cosmic triumph. Their interaction is contributing to the spiral of destruction and hate that is threatening the entire Middle East with conflagration. Religious and ethnic fundamentalism is also present in parts of Africa, in Hinduism, and in Japan. Its divisive dogmatism upsets the moral and socio-political equilibrium of the world.

Against this fundamentalist trend stands wisdom. In the wisdom traditions, the issue is not how to be “saved” or how to defeat the “infidel.” The focus of wisdom is how to live in harmony with nature and all other sentient beings. Wisdom in all the great religious traditions concerns the process by which o­ne comes to identify with the whole human community and to understand values common to all humanity. It is that aspect of human reflection that emphasizes the process of personal and communal transformation within a divine presence that encompasses all life and is available to all who seek its transformative power. In Judaism, for instance, this understanding is expressed as “Sophia.” In Christianity, it is expressed as the “Cosmic Christ.” In Islam, Sufism has refined this awareness…

As the twenty first century unfolds, we bear witness to a great struggle between nation states and armed groups intent o­n conflict and destruction. This struggle has many social, political and environmental causes and repercussions. Undergirding and shaping this complexity lies a religious and cultural tension between those who emphasize the exclusivity of sect and those who embrace the inclusivity of wisdom. It is between literalist and non-literalist, between the fundamentalists and the universalists, between those who seek distinctions in order to divide and those who seek commonalities in order to unite.

Illuminating wisdom in this time of intolerance, terrorism and conflict, will not be an easy process. The endeavor will be fraught with difficulties and dangers. There are many forces, institutions and leaders who are motivated by the acquisition of power and have much invested in sectarian divisions and the politics of fear. We are in a time of overweening pride and the willingness to use force, and a time of competition, exclusion and degradation of community and the environment.

What is needed more than anything is a sense of interdependence, of proportion, of humility in the face of life’s complexities and human diversity. It is not an overstatement to say that in this time of crisis and opportunity, wisdom can illuminate the way. Wisdom may, in the end, be humanity’s o­nly source of peace and hope…

Using wisdom to fashion the future harks back to the earliest days of human reflection o­n how to live with intelligence and compassion. In antiquity, the Greek schools of Parmenides and Empedocles, and the academies of Pythagoras, Plato and Aristotle were wisdom schools. Indeed, the meaning of philosopher, a Greek word, is “lover of wisdom.” Wisdom schools also flourished in ancient Rome, Egypt, Mesopotamia, India, China, and among the Incas, Aztecs and Mayans in the Americas.

These schools were the precursors to what came into full bloom in twelfth century Islam and in Europe: the “university,” from the Latin universitas, meaning cosmic order or harmony. When the great scholastic theologian, Thomas Aquinas, gave his inaugural lecture at the first such school, the University of Paris, he chose wisdom as his topic. In that first university, as in antiquity, wisdom was considered the queen of the sciences.

In the ancient wisdom schools as well as in the earliest universities, the quest for cosmic order, expressed as justice, was at their center. Thus, the “isness” and the “oughtness” of life were understood as integral to o­ne another. Virtue was inherent in and inseparable from truth, beauty and goodness. Compassion without intelligence was seen as little more than sentiment, and often divisive. Intelligence without compassion was seen as cold and indifferent, and often cruel. The integration of compassion and intelligence was seen as the wellspring of wisdom…Such dimensionality lies at the heart of the wisdom civilization for which humanity has yearned since the beginning of its earthly journey.


Continue reading