Comments on: Unscientific Science

By: admin

admin — Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:10:41 +0000

In reply to Shan. How sweet.

By: Shan

Shan — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:23:01 +0000

No matter how these crop circles came about, they move me like no other art form ever has. TRUTH WILL EMERGE IN TIME. Meanwhile, thanks to the Intelligent Beings who have created them.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:17:47 +0000

A+ would read again

By: Doug Morrison

Doug Morrison — Sun, 08 Aug 2010 17:16:27 +0000

You’re giving these people too much credit for disseminating info and then influencing people. The people who read, and write Nature and Yahoo News have already made up their minds. They are propagandists and liars with an agenda. Of course, they don’t want your comments. We mustn’t let them define the discussion. We have proof; they’re just talking jive. These are materialists who cannot see past ‘the scientific method’ and ‘practical approach’ to investigating anomalies, crop circles and other phenomena. These people have their limited uses in the material world, but they’re useless in trying to understand crop circles, or spirituality in general. They don’t have the mental perspective to see crop circles. They may well be stuck in the Christian mindset and be virtual morons as far as spirituality is concerned. Their ideas will not change. I see no reason to listen to these liars and give them validity. Time and history will prove them wrong and we’ll have wasted time talking to them instead of talking to people who can help this world by dealing with the ACTUAL, which, in this case, are crop circles. So, f ’em. Call ’em out, use contempt and ridicule to out them. There are so many others out there who do want to know. We have to remember that only about 20% of people are watching and thinking about the actual reality of Planet Earth. 80% are just told what to do.

Who should we be talking to? That’s the question.

I think we should talk to spiritualists, interested open scientists and mathematicians. Other publications must be contacted. Mostly, let’s remember that we’re correct and they’re using propaganda to lie. Let’s not have a conversation with old fools like Yahoo and Nature; let’s start a new conversation with new outlets about why they lie in the face of all this evidence. That’s the thread we should be pursuing. That’s also the essay I should be writing instead of comments, but it’s just not happening yet.

From Suzanne:

Get to writing that essay, to continue on with the great one you’ve already written about the circles: http://tinyurl.com/3a453kt

By: Robert Bengtson

Robert Bengtson — Sun, 08 Aug 2010 16:32:57 +0000

i enjoyed your written response to Nature. It's about the opening of eyes long closed. Across so many facets of how we are living our lives. Nature. Community. Food. Service. Economics. Education.

By: Molly Lebherz

Molly Lebherz — Sun, 08 Aug 2010 02:26:38 +0000

We just read this astonishing Nature article and your concise comment to this gentleman. My husband is a 'science guy' - was professor of biochemistry for over 20 years and was published in Nature in the 70s. He and I are both open-mouthed at this article. There must be a real disinformation push coming from somewhere. Anyway, the 'coincidence' of this is that we have a small summer home in Oregon, where we are currently at, that is only about 20 miles from the University in Eugene. Hummmmm. I am going to give this a big think and feel if there is anything I am to do. At the very least I could courteously hand deliver a stack of comments from others to this fellow! We will be here until early October. Please stay in touch. It's a fascinating time.

By: toni Wilder

toni Wilder — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:23:20 +0000

Thanks Suzanne for your work.

By: Pat

Pat — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 23:23:42 +0000

If anyone actually tried to copy some of these crop designs on paper, they’d realize how hard it is to accomplish on a small scale, much less the size of a football field. And who is able to weave all those intricate designs into the larger pictures? Remember, the word “skeptic” actually means “to investigate”, not to stick your head in the sand and deny something is happening. Look around and experience the wonder and awe of a true mystery.

From Suzanne:

Thanks for that definition. When I do radio programs and they ask me for a closing thought, I always say some version of “Don’t be cynical; be curious.”