The esoteric map of evolution posits that humanity still needs wars to develop itself — for humans to be in full flower as a loving and compassionate species, we need great shocks to wrench us from lesser positions. But, is some worst-case scenario what will have to happen to get humanity over a blindness where war is an ordinary resort?
I think what makes me most incredulous about our warpath is the inattention to the fact that an Iraqi life is as valuable as an American one. It is contemptible not to think this way. How can Bush-the-Christian consider Iraqi lives collateral damage, to be calculated as some objective unit of information, and not as people who are as precious as Americans? Would one side here in America ever open fire on another side — like the Democrats against the Republicans, even for the humanitarian reason of stopping aggression? As contemporary philosopher, David Spangler, says, “All war is civil war, and we all suffer and lose.”
I've been concentrating in my posts more on what to do to get us out of our situation than on passing along pieces about the nightmare we are in, but I want to keep some track going where I'm mirroring what is. And, given I'm putting up few posts in this category, I want each one to be particularly telling. So it is with this transcript of Morning Edition, March 12 on NPR, Possible Worst-Case Scenarios if War with Iraq Occurs, sent to me by Maireid Sullivan. The speaker is Retired Colonel Mike Turner, General Schwarzkopf's personal briefing officer during Operation Desert Shield and Operation Desert Storm.
Here's an excerpt:
Perhaps we can pull this off, but here's a far worse scenario that's at least as likely. Within hours of our attack, Saddam launches Scuds on Israel. Israel's right-wing government launches a full-scale attack on Iraq, creating a holy war nightmare. Saddam, threatened with his own survival, uses chemical and biological weapons and human shields just as he has in the past. He torches his own oil fields, thousands of his own people are killed. Photos of American soldiers amid landscapes of Iraqi civilian bodies blanket the world press which aligns unanimously against the US. The US is condemned by NATO and the UN.
The war ends within a few weeks, but the crisis deepens. The US is left to administer a political vacuum in Iraq. Iran is emboldened to help the Shiites in the south. Disease breaks out, food and water are contaminated and the cost of the war skyrockets. The US economy is dealt a body blow, but the administration can find no credible way out. Britain's Prime Minister Blair is voted out of office.
Meanwhile, al-Qaeda, seeing an opportunity due to a shift in US focus, attacks a major US target. North Korea, emboldened by the distraction, ignores diplomatic efforts to restrain its development of nuclear weapons and begins to export weapons-grade plutonium to terrorists.
These are not remote possibilities, but in my view reasonable, possibly even likely outcomes.