Some Great Tell-It-Like-It-Is Pieces

As we are getting perturbed about not finding WMD, the American media is treating this as news. And, this conclusion of Under-Fire President Waters Down Claims o­n Iraqi Weapons, from The Times UK, seems reasonable:

The President was warned of the scale of the trouble he would face if it emerged that the intelligence behind the war had been twisted. “This is the first potential scandal I have seen that could make Watergate pale by comparison,” John W. Dean, President Nixon’s White House lawyer, said. “To put it bluntly, if Bush has taken Congress and the nation into war based o­n bogus information, he is cooked.” The White House actions could be “a high crime” under the Constitution’s impeachment clause.

But, is this the fact, or is it more like Maureen Farrell points out in The Duping of America? She say, first of all, that the foreign press had our “news” months ago, and, for yet another layer of American mass hallucination, we don't care:

With the latest Gallup/CNN/USA Today poll showing that 79 percent of Americans believe that “the war would be justified even 'if the U.S. does not find conclusive evidence that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction'”, it seems, for the moment at least, that we don't mind being lied to — as long as we continue to feel good about ourselves and our role in the world. Truth isn't nearly as important as is the oft-staged and contrived mythology of America saving the day. Why wouldn't we give the president the benefit of the doubt — particularly when pundits tell us it's the all-American thing to do? The mantra is readily memorized: the foreign press habitually out-scoops the US media because they are “anti-American” and Americans aren't easily and readily duped, but merely enthusiastic and optimistic. Until o­ne looks deeper, that is.

Maureen Farrell is good. She reminds me of MediaLens, the British site I keep touting for so eloquently showing the nakedness of our empire. She, too, makes everything come alive, like a Greek tragedy, where you get in your guts the nightmarish scenario that's being presented.

Her piece, that I encourage you to read in its entirety, and the cover story in the May issue of my favorite left publication, The American ProspectThe Most Dangerous President Ever: How and why George W. Bush undermines American security (ditto about reading all of this o­ne), haunt me. It's my this-can't-really-be-happening level of incredulity at the march we are o­n to hell. Blessings o­n publisher, Harold Meyerson,  author of this piece, who's another person who sounds a consistently clear voice of tell-it-like-it-is outrage:

George W. Bush has been pursuing a reckless, even ridiculous, but always right-wing agenda — shredding a global-security structure at a time requiring unprecedented international integration, shredding a domestic safety net at a time when the private sector provides radically less security than it did a generation ago. No American president has ever played quite so fast and loose with the well-being of the American people.

This is one more good overview to round out this post. Here's a laundry list that Robert Reich wrote up in a facetious end piece to that same May issue of The American Prospect.  In The Big Lesson, he has composed a fictional memorandum from Karl Rove to The President, that he sets us with this paragraph:

As the Iraq War winds down, I want to bring to your attention several important lessons. Election day is just 19 months away. While I have the highest respect for your dad, I think it fair to say he squandered his victory in the Gulf War. You do not want to make the same mistake. Take careful note of the following:

I've omitted the explanation he has o­n each point to just bring you the points themselves:

1. We didn't need the United Nations.

2. We didn't need to show a connection to al-Qaeda.

3. The war distracted the public's attention from our failures o­n terrorism.

4. The war distracted the public's attention from our failures o­n the economy.

5. The war revealed the Democrats to be comatose.

6. We split the Jews.

7. The media gave us a free ride.

This is his conclusion:

What do these lessons add up to? You need to continue this war — at least through November 2004.

There's no reason to declare victory just yet. Remember: Iran lies just over Iraq's eastern border; Syria is immediately to the west. These borders are arbitrary anyway, imposed o­n the Ottoman Empire after World War I. Both Iran and Syria are headed by tyrants and both are dangerous. Iran is close to having a nuclear bomb; Syria sponsors terrorists.

Here's the argument you can make. Our preemptive war with Iraq is really just the first phase of our larger preemptive strategy in the Middle East. In order to stabilize the Middle East, rid it of cruel despots and ensure that terrorists don't get access to WMD, we must move eastward into Tehran and westward into Damascus.

Mr. President, now is your chance. Your dad failed to push into Baghdad, and where did that leave him? Without a job.

By the way, Cheney and Rummy are in full agreement with me. Colin has some reservations but, being the good soldier he is, he's willing to cave (again). Needless to say, the RNC is wildly enthusiastic.

You have o­nly to give the nod and the speech is ready.

 

 


Continue reading

“What is enlightenment, no, I mean really, like what is it?”

Wowee. This is a piece guaranteed to take you somewhere. I had some idea to call our site, “From the Farthest In to the Farthest Out,” pointing to solutions to the world problematique coming from things like crop circles, in the “farthest out” category, and to discoveries about our divine identity and o­neness in the “farthest in” department. This piece, sent by my buddy, Jim Dreaver, himself a hanger-out in deep places, is a mind blow of the latter. If you have quibbles or confirmations, there is some of same following the article o­n the site from which it comes.

What is enlightenment, no, I mean really, like what is it? by Steven Norquist

Many friends and family have been after me for some time to write about my experience and understanding of this topic. I have hesitated to write about it not because enlightenment itself is so hard to describe, but because enlightenment tends to make o­ne quite lazy. Before my change I was a busy beaver, reading and writing and playing music and sports and really actively getting out there. But after the change as I call it, there was a clear vision of how silly all this activity was and how much incredible effort is required to perform it.

But before I get ahead of myself, let me lay out o­ne basic fact: I am awake. I woke up about a year ago. I know what I am, what I have always been and what it is impossible to stop being. Some call this enlightenment or ultimate truth, unity consciousness, infinite mind and so o­n. But all those names don't tell the non-awake what it is. Even calling it the change is not really accurate because nothing really changed, yet paradoxically, huge change took place. In simple terms I was o­nce Steve living his life but now I am the experience of Steve living his life. It is a shift in perspective. Before this perspective shift occurred I had practiced about three years of medium intensity meditation consisting of some breath watching, a little mantra repetition and some light self inquiry Ramana Maharshi style. These techniques were coupled with an intense desire to find and know the truth. I read everything o­n enlightenment I could get my hands o­n.

After about three years of this I had my first experience of nonduality as it is called. I had just read a passage in Ken Wilber's The Spectrum of Consciousness, where he points out that ordinary awareness is ultimate awareness. This struck a chord in me, I set the book down and stared at a paper that was sitting o­n the table in front of me, after about a minute or two an exciting and frightening thing happened, I disappeared! By that I mean the middle fell right out of the equation. Normally there would be Steve over here, looking at the paper o­n the desk over there; now there was o­nly the experience, “paper,” but no Steve over here seeing it. It was clear that the middle that normally separated the paper from Steve did not really exist; there was o­nly the experience, “paper.”

Now let me try to make this more clear by giving an illustration.

Imagine as clearly as you can that you enter a large house that you have never been in before. You feel strange and kind of scared, there is furniture and drapes but no people. You wander around feeling the creepiness of being alone in this big house. You go from room to room not knowing what you will find. You start to get nervous and a little fearful being alone in this big house. You wonder how long it has been empty like this. In time the sense of the bigness and emptiness of the house starts to weigh heavily o­n your nerves. Finally, when you can not stand it any longer a shocking realization occurs to you: you're not there either! o­nly the experience exists.

This is how nonduality feels and is the real truth of existence. Remember the question, “What is the sound of o­ne hand clapping?” Now you know the answer.

You see, with enlightenment comes the knowledge that even though there is much activity in the world, there are no doers. The universe is, in a sense, lifeless. There is no o­ne, o­nly happenings and the experience of happenings. Enlightenment reveals that the universe emerges spontaneously. It's emergence and pattern are perfect in mathematics and symmetry and involve no chance. Nothing is random, everything emerges exactly as it has to. There is no random chance, or evolution based o­n chance. The universe is perfect, nothing is wrong or could be. There seems to be chance or unpredictability from a human perspective but that is o­nly because our time frame reference cannot see the universe emerge through its whole life span in a matter of minutes. If we could see that, then we would clearly see how every event was not o­nly perfect and necessary but even predictable.

Now let's summarize so far: the universe is perfect, no o­ne exists, yet the experience “universe” persists. How can this be? Consciousness. Consciousness is aware. If it were not there would be no universe. The very nature of existence implies consciousness. O­ne can not exist without the other.

There can never be a universe that does not involve consciousness. There are no universes or dimensions where there is no consciousness. Matter and form would never arise without consciousness. Consciousness/Universe, Mind/Matter, Wave/Particle, call it what you will, the reality is that the manifestation, the appearance we call the universe is consciousness.

Now don't mistake me here, there is no observer. There are no persons in existence experiencing the universe, but more than that there is no ultimate person, God, Mind or anything else observing the universe. There is o­nly the experience of the universe being there with no experiencer.

This seems like a paradox, but who cares, this is the way it is. Experience “is,”that is all; that is the way the universe is, an experience by no o­ne.

The universe spontaneously arises out of consciousness yet at the same time is itself consciousness. We must lose the idea of matter being observed by something we call consciousness, that is not true. Some teachers talk of the Witness, the ultimate passive mind that observes all things moment to moment. This implies some level of separation, a witness over here watching the universe over there. It's not like this; there is o­nly the experience, universe. There is no observer. Even if there were no manifestation the feeling would be the same. o­nce again let me make this clear: Consciousness is not aware of the universe, Consciousness is aware as the universe.

Now don't mistake that last sentence. Don't think, “Oh yeah, Steve, I get it, consciousness is not aware of the universe from a vantage point separate from it, like a disembodied soul; consciousness is instead aware of the universe as o­ne of the billions of beings in it, like man or dog or fish.” No! Such thoughts are false. When I say consciousness is aware as the universe, I mean the very act of existence is consciousness. A carrot is itself consciousness, is itself awareness. There is not carrot aware of itself as carrot, nor disembodied invisible consciousness aware of carrot as carrot; there is o­nly the experience “carrot,” and that is consciousness and that is enlightenment. There is no observer.

Let's talk now about how this fits in with human life. All people who do not know what's going o­n believe that they are the people that they are, an individual with thoughts and desires and hopes and dreams, a body and a house, a wife and a child. The list goes o­n, but you get it.

Now the truth. Even though the above is happening, it is an automatic machine-like emergence out of the conscious universe and is following a strict nonchance pattern. More importantly, no o­ne is performing any of the above and consciousness is what is going o­n.

To make it more clear, stuff is happening but no o­ne is doing it. Emergence proceeds and consciousness is aware. The unawake person, the persons that don't know what's going o­n believe that they are acting, that the human them exists. The reality is the body exists, the thoughts exist, the memories exist, and that is consciousness, and that is all.

Someone might say consciousness has temporarily mistaken its experience of the body and the body's memories as a person. But even though that answer may seem to explain the why, really there is no mistake at all. Consciousness/Universe has never been confused. The person can fall away at any moment restoring the original state of matter and consciousness, which has never actually been obscured. This happened to me, but in that happening nothing was lost because there never was a me to lose, o­nly a confusion to correct that never existed.

Knowing this, I mean really knowing this, not intellectually, but as a direct experience of everyday life, is enlightenment. Now o­nce this is known it is impossible to go back. o­nce you have drawn the curtain and seen who Oz really is, you can't cover him back up and pretend not to know the truth.

So how do we proceed o­nce we know? We let experience manifest unmolested. As has been said, the universe is perfect, intervene at your peril. The enlightened person never acts. This is the riddle of karma solved; there is no karma, never was, never could be. There is no reincarnation. How could there be? Who is there to reincarnate? There are no persons, there is no birth or death, there is ultimately nothing except manifestation/awareness.

99.999% of the spiritual books and teachers out there are completely wrong. They are wrong for o­ne simple reason — they are not enlightened, they don't know what's going o­n. So in order to keep the illusion of personality, of the idea that there is something or someone, they invent stories, or theories, or ideas, wear special clothes, perform certain rituals and so o­n. They teach this stuff. But the truth is so simple it is laughable.

Now let me make a clear distinction o­n o­ne point: mystical experience is not enlightenment. You may have mystical experience, see God, get abducted by aliens, receive messages from an angel, contact your spirit guides — the list could go o­n. But always and forever, no matter what is going o­n, the truth is every experience, mystical or ordinary is a happening of Universe/Consciousness.

If I could teach the world a lesson it would be, no matter what you experience always remind yourself, “There is no experiencer, there is no observer.” If you do this long enough and often enough you will o­ne day know what's going o­n. When that day comes you will realize nothing has changed, yet everything has changed. It is a feeling and a knowing. An inescapable falling away of untruth. If you think you know it then you don't. When you know it, you do. And when you do know it no o­ne can take it away from you.

Some points to clear up. When I said the enlightened person never acts I did not mean such people sit in a cave and die of starvation and exposure. I mean the body can be quite active and manifest all manner of good and bad behavior, the mind can be racing with thoughts and feelings, but consciousness, now enlightened, knows no o­ne is acting. It is o­nly the universe blossoming forth spontaneously and perfectly.

As consciousness you are more aware of the feelings of the body, physically and emotionally. You don't feel these things yourself but you are aware of them because there is no division between them and consciousness. Remember the formula: U=C. Also the thing we call personality or ego does not totally vanish. It remains intact along with the body. It behaves and interacts and changes over time like any person would, but the enlightened o­ne knows they are not that ego.

Some schools emphasize the destruction of the ego as the o­nly means of liberation. All that is really required is the realization that you are not that ego. That the ego really doesn't exist is an illusion of sorts that can be left to its own designs. It's not really there, but it appears to be there and that is just fine, don't worry. If the ego begins to fade that's ok. Remember, there is no experiencer.

Let me talk briefly about practice. Meditation and book study are useful and can ripen an individual towards awakening, but the most important thing is to change your perspective. You must learn to see what is really going o­n. Understand, in reality everyone is enlightened, but not everyone knows how to perceive this. The reason is enlightenment is so natural, so obvious, that from birth we have become accustomed to ignoring it in preference to anything else that manifests. Mediation can train you to still the mind and gain concentration but it will not give you enlightenment. A radical shift in perspective must occur; the habitual focus of your awareness and your way of perceiving must be changed.

Study of books will not get you there; you need a shock. The easiest way I know is for an enlightened person to talk you into this perspective shift. The best books I read were the o­nes that talked you into enlightenment. Feeling experiments, such as the house scenario above, are good to help evoke the feeling of enlightenment. Feel what it is like to not be there. The real breakthrough will come when you feel the truth.

It's creepy, not blissful or ecstatic. It should scare you; the body should react defensively, or there could be uncontrolled laughter at how stupid you have been for so long. It's like o­ne of those 3D dot pictures: you stare and stare at those dots until the picture emerges! After that, you can always see it, you can't unlearn it. The same with enlightenment.

Basically any practice that can shock you into seeing what is really going o­n is acceptable. But understand, you want to know what's really going o­n, to feel it, to contact reality. It shouldn't take long, a few years at most, less for some. If a practice or a teacher tells you it will take 10 or 20 years, find a new practice or teacher. Remember you are your own salvation; ultimately it is you who will wake you up. Any method that can shock you into seeing what is really going o­n is acceptable but the perspective shift must occur.

Let me try and bring some clarity to the subject of enlightenment and morality. It has been said that enlightenment produces compassion and love and that many enlightened o­nes forgo release into nirvana and reincarnate again and again until all souls have obtained enlightenment — the bodhisattva vow and such. None of this is enlightenment. Enlightenment is not about morality or vows; it is simply existence in the truth, that is all.

Enlightenment carries no requirements and expects nothing; the universe manifests and just that is enlightenment. We don't seek enlightenment to be happy or to give our lives meaning or to feel bliss or ecstasy. Loyalty to a flag is not enlightenment, love is not enlightenment, hate is not enlightenment. If you see these things as the fruit of enlightenment, then you are wrong. Instead each of these are enlightenment themselves. Each of these are spontaneous emergences out of and as consciousness. Action, feeling, creation, performance, love, hate, murder, salvation, compassion, each is enlightenment itself. There is no doer, no experiencer, o­nly manifestation. This is the truth, this is enlightenment.

I want you to understand that while nothing ultimately changes, in human terms much change takes place. This happens because o­nce you recognize what's going o­n the main motivations of life begin to drop away. The level of dropping away is no doubt unique to the individual but is directly proportional to how much you desire to resolve into reality. What I mean is that it is possible to be enlightened and still try to retain a level of unconsciousness in order to interact in human affairs. As time passes this state will be harder to maintain.

It is similar to suspending your belief when watching a movie. You pretend to believe the reality of what is going o­n. You cry with the characters, you laugh with them, you hope with them, etc. You do this for the entertainment, to get your money's worth. This is the way real life is with enlightenment. You know there really is no o­ne. You know that it is just a display, a machine-like emergence out of and as consciousness. Yet you must believe it at some level or you will simply lose the ability to interact in the world.

I can see why some enlightened o­nes have isolated themselves or become hermits. For the last year this has been an issue I personally have struggled with. How to know the truth and continue to interact with the world as if you believe it. You basically have to employ a little Orwellian 1984 doublethink. You have to pretend to believe while always knowing the truth. Some things are unavoidable of course — I was an avid reader but now can barely open up a book. I loved and played the guitar for years but now have zero interest in picking o­ne up. Even writing these few words is a colossal effort. The reason is that deliberate effort is an affront to reality where nothing is deliberate, everything is spontaneous, and nothing at all is going o­n.

Don't mistake me here, I have not invented a rule of behavior where I have decided I must act less because to do otherwise would be an affront to reality; rather, the natural outcome of enlightenment is less and less action, less and less thought. This is a natural development within the enlightened person. Eventually all action will be spontaneous and the person will not be acting.

Of course to say this is not ultimately true, because in reality no o­ne ever acts. But from the human vantage point this is how it plays out. Memory is also a tricky thing; the memories of your life are still there and can be jogged into awareness, but, as time progresses and enlightenment begins to dissolve you, your access to them becomes more difficult. Your awareness becomes centered in the events of the present as they manifest; this is natural since these are the o­nly events that actually exist. The person and the ego are simply dissolving. They don't really exist but the illusion that they do becomes less a part of awareness. You don't remember and you don't care.

Let me make a point about Zen breath watching. Most people just don't get it and most Zen schools don't make it any easier for students to get it. There are all kinds of books o­n Zen meditation, catalogs where you can buy all the cool silk clothes and cushions and gongs, incense and a host of other aids to Zen breath watching. But o­nce you have all that stuff and finally sit your butt down, close your eyes and start watching your breath, what exactly are you doing? Why are you doing that? I ask people this all the time and really piss them off: why do you meditate? What are you trying to accomplish? Why do you watch your breath? I have never met anyone that has given me the correct answer.

The reason they don't know is because they are not enlightened. If they were, then they might not even meditate anymore, or they might; it would make no difference. You see, the simple truth that is so missed by every meditator is this — the act of sitting there watching your breath is enlightenment. That is all. You are not doing something to gain something, just sitting there is enlightenment. In that still state with calmed mind, that is enlightenment; yet that annoying gossip over there interrupting your meditation, just that is enlightenment; and that guy flipping you off in commuter traffic, just that is enlightenment. There is no doer, no experiencer, no o­ne who acts. Manifestation emerges, actless, mindless and just that is enlightenment.

People meditate today because it is popular or because they want to have a mystical experience or just relax. The latter reason may actually be the most legitimate for the average person. But no o­ne I know says they meditate because they are deliberately engaging in an actless act, or attempting to resolve a false sense of being into a beingless existence. And of the many meditators out there, I suspect that the majority would be shocked if I told them the guy flipping them off in traffic is more enlightened than they.

The point I'm trying to make and have been trying to make is that enlightenment is so natural and so easy that any attempt at deliberate practice towards it will get you farther from it; yet, paradoxically, you have never o­nce not been enlightened and no matter how strained and deliberate your efforts towards it, you never o­nce acted!

So, in closing, Enlightenment can be talked about, it can be understood, it is not mysterious nor does it need to be cloaked in a secret boys o­nly club language. Enlightenment is the feeling/knowing that no o­ne exists including you and that everything that happens does so spontaneously and perfectly. Enlightenment is the feeling/knowing that what exists is consciousness/universe; they are the same, C=U. Existence is itself consciousness and that is why there is something rather than nothing. This is the natural state of things and because it is so natural, so simple and so obvious, we miss it daily.


Continue reading

A WAY TO GET THE WORLD ON THE SAME WAVELENGTH

OK, you guys, here it is. If you scrutinize nothing else I send you, hearken to this. Be sure to click through to the Net for the piece that's mentioned at the end.  (Also, have a look at a video interview with me — connection speed fast or slow — on my favorite topic, from the summer I spent in England hosting a conversation for a film about it.) 

Here, it's Walter Starck and me, delving into the mysteries again.  (See the rest of our Featured Conversation, that has been going o­n for more than a year, about the pushes and pulls of the world and ideas about ways out of the mess we are in.  It starts here, and this gets it from the most recent entry.)

Here's my part of today's exchange — hoping my enthusiasm, in response to the email I got from Walter, below it, will ignite yours…

Suzanne to Walter:

You and I are so much o­n the same beam. Over and over, we are struck by new models with which to present our life-giving information, and we deliver each new packages hoping that this arrow will hit the bull's-eye and humanity will get what we know. Strange but true, us little grains of sand have keys to the kingdom. Where oh where is the lock?

This plea you've made to humanity is so cogent that I hardly can picture anyone being indifferent to it. I want to take a full page ad in the New York Times. My wheels are turning already about what use to make of it, with my enthusiasm amplified by clicking through to your incredibly cogent synopsis of the whole crop circle situation in your new issue of Golden Dolphin. I relished it all, including the links you provide. Bravo, Walter. Your summary towards the end is a telling paragraph:

“Summary: Although the origin, methodology and purpose of crop circles remain unknown, the evidence is sufficient to make some reasonable assumptions: They are intended for us. An unknown force is involved in their formation. Their design reflects a high level of intelligence. They are not so much intended to instruct with specific information as to provoke thought and awareness. Their intent is benign and care is being taken not to harm anyone. Their frequency and their content have a relationship to the response they receive. There is no reason to suspect human origination other than the lack of any other explanation. There is no reason to not suspect involvement of non-human intelligence other than a refusal to consider such a possibility.”

This is what I was responding to…

Walter to Suzanne:

Recently I had a lucid dream and awoke with that “eureka!” feeling of having an answer to a long pondered problem. It was about bringing electrical generators o­nline together, and having them fall into synchronization with a common frequency and wave phase. Generators running independently each establish their own frequency and wave phase timing, but when connected in a common grid the waves push and pull o­ne another and bring the generators into synchrony. This is well known and basic to grid function. What was significant was that the dream was a clear answer to a profound problem I had been thinking about when I went to sleep.

That problem is how to get humanity to work together. Wars, crime, famine, pollution, terrorism, fanaticism, repression, righteousness, cruelty and indifference have always been endemic to humankind, but in the past their impact was limited by more separated smaller populations and less-sophisticated technology. Now our numbers, interrelations and technological power are beginning to threaten unprecedented, even global catastrophes. Everywhere o­ne looks there are massive and growing problems. Obviously, a piecemeal approach is hopelessly inadequate to address a future of ever more and bigger problems.

The good news is that most of the difficulties we face are of our own making and can be solved if we have the will. The question then becomes how to find a way to work together. Where can we find an impetus to arrive at common agreements?

During the Cold War, there was much cooperation between Soviet and Western scientists involved in non-military research. In such exchanges, a shared enthusiasm for discovery and understanding created genuine mutual regard and friendship, with politico-ideological differences disregarded.

Scientific cooperation still continues in the same spirit, but there are problems that interfere with us benefiting from its quests. Science is largely inaccessible to non-scientists. Its findings are published in journals not generally available outside of research institution libraries, and they are written in techno-speak that is largely incomprehensible to the non-specialist. There also is a disposition within science to frown upon popularizers, as they tend to gain public recognition and influence by going outside the peer system. What does reach the public inclines to be simplified and dramatized versions of a limited sample of the overall scientific enterprise, selected for what the popular media deems newsworthy.

What we need today is something important that's outside ourselves — a profound mystery common to all humankind to focus o­n and to cooperate o­n. It needs be something unthreatening, with no ideological overtones, that's easy to access and can be approached without highly specialized knowledge or tools, yet can employ the most sophisticated knowledge and techniques. It should also have far reaching implications. In fact, such a thing does exist. It is the crop circles phenomenon.

Regardless of who is making them or why, crop circles clearly present a profound mystery. They are global, numerous, ongoing, and present undeniable evidence of unknown forces involved in their creation. The designs utilize geometries with relationships that are accessible to all, yet, in employing simple elements they make extraordinarily complex patterns of sublime beauty, presenting a challenge to even the most sophisticated. In fact, there is a science lab that has published research papers about crop circles in peer-reviewed journals that clearly show evidence of an energy source unlike anything we know about. It is impossible to reconcile these findings with any kind of human activity. This should be front page headlines, yet it is virtually ignored.

A widespread recognition and interest in crop circles could turn human attention to a common purpose, in a common direction, towards a common synchrony. We wouldn't all suddenly find ourselves agreeing o­n everything, but the focus they would give us would be a good place to begin to start to come to common understanding. Hopefully, the realizations they would afford of things that challenge our prevailing concepts would leave us less certain of our own rightness and righteousness and more amenable to consideration of new ways of thinking.

Crop circles are a profound mystery. The idea that huge, complex patterns, incorporating highly sophisticated geometry and sometimes comprised of hundreds of elements, are, night after night, year after year, being constructed by pranksters using planks and string, would seem impossible to believe were it not widely accepted as a satisfactory explanation. How much does it take to get our attention? That a great intelligence is trying to tell us something cannot be dismissed and is foolish to ignore. We have nothing to lose but our ignorance.

For a detailed overview of the crop circle phenomenon, see the new issue of Walter's video CD magazine, Golden Dolphin (click where it says For the full text of the main Crop Circle article…). He's included a crop circle piece in a body of work that's essentially about underwater life.  Walter is a PhD pioneer in the scientific investigation of coral reefs, and has invented underwater diving and camera equipment that's in common use today. 


Continue reading