A Matter of Time?

A front page piece in the L.A. Times yesterday, Threat of 'Dirty Bomb' Growing, Officials Say,

tells us that there's readily available material for “a 'dirty bomb' that would spew radioactive fallout across an American or European city…it would result in some fatalities, radiation sickness, mass panic and enormous economic damage.” This chilling story goes o­n to say, “The threat of attack is great enough that a senior European intelligence official, speaking o­n condition of anonymity, said it is 'not a matter of if there is a nuclear-related attack by Al Qaeda, but when it occurs.'” The head of the MIA, which is the British CIA, says, “…it will o­nly be a matter of time before a crude version of a CBRN attack is launched at a major Western city and o­nly a matter of time before that crude version becomes something more sophisticated…”

Every time I read things about the possibility of the horror of what's happened elsewhere, and worse, befalling my city, I'm renewed in my determination to get the crop circles to be taken seriously. It's not a “So what?,” as some suggest. Paul Horowitz, Project Director of the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI), which used to be a government agency and now is privately funded — significantly by Paul Allen, a founder of Microsoft (I've written to him) — says what would apply to some women, too:

If we were to discover extra-terrestrial life, it would show that we are not intellectually unique in the galaxy. Man has a tendency to think he's very special. We consider ourselves morally, culturally, and intellectually unique. But if we were to find a signal from another star system, another thinking being, we would know that none of that is true. A connection with another intelligence would be the first bridging across four billion years of independent life in evolution. It would be the end of Earth's cultural isolation in a galaxy and a universe surely containing millions of other civilizations. It would be without doubt the greatest discovery in the history of humankind.

I think of how readily available the documentation is that the circles are being delivered from elsewhere, and how all it would take would be o­ne Nobel laureate o­n a soapbox pointing to those findings. Or o­ne Dustin Hoffman, whom I met in a waiting room right after doing my PowerPoint circle presentation for his daughter's high school class — and who's not different from others in that I've had no response to material he said to send him. A leading progressive, who sees fundamental change as our o­nly out and complains because the world won't read his book and take his idea for that seriously, gave me these responses when I pointed to our similar frustrations as a way to enroll him for the circles:

>> Please — I wonder if we are even o­n the same planet — metaphorically speaking. At any rate, don't write me about this any more, please. It is not going to achieve anything.

>>> I'm sorry you feel badly about someone thinking your position is unworthy, not even remotely worthy, but you might want to seriously consider that people you think are astute respond in this manner…Crop circles? Don't write me again about this matter…I don't have any time to give it. None.

>>>> You are writing people telling them they should pay attention to what is generally deemed to be utter insanity. Like little green men o­n the other side of the moon. Now let's be done with this.

Although people who know what's happening in the crop fields have been signing o­nto the call for an investigation, I still need others who are household names or have heavy duty science credentials, and I'm passing along, for your help with that, what I selectively email now. I've worked and reworked this to make it clear — and, as always, suggestions for even more improvements are welcome:

REQUEST FOR SIGNATURES

To get the world out of the mess it's in, a shift of consciousness is what we most need. We'll never solve the world problematique without it — as Einstein said, problems are not solvable at the level of consciousness that created them. My advocacy for evoking a consciousness shift is via the crop circle phenomenon. This most unusual thing happening o­n Earth has not been taken seriously — you can think Galileo for how radical change is resisted. Research that has been done, however, leads to the conclusion that a non-human agency is making these marks o­n Earth. Since we've never identified anything other than ourselves with the capacity to design there's no way to know the source, but we can study the footprints that source leaves. They show the phenomenon as a function of processes we can't perform, done by intelligences with design capacities that exceed virtually all people's talents. When this is introduced into the world's conversation, it won't go away and figures to open people's minds at a time when everyone is imploded in a small minded violent engagement.

To call attention to the circles and the body of work that has been done o­n them, signatures are being sought for this document, with special interest in enrolling people from the scientific community, the media, and others who get listened to. All it says is that the situation should be investigated — no o­ne has to be a believer for that.

WHAT IF THEY’RE REAL?
A Call For an Investigation of Available Research o­n Crop Circles

http://theconversation.org/call.htm [This is the document for signature,
which supports the value of the call it makes and gives information that
points to the authenticity of the phenomenon.]

Suzanne Taylor
suzanne@mightycompanions.org

http://theconversation.org
Executive Producer, CROP CIRCLES: Quest for Truth
http://mightycompanions.org/cropcircles

If you haven't, please sign the call yourself. Also, especially take note of the “booklet” it links to that counters the prevailing understanding that people are responsible: Why Real Crop Circles Can't be Hoaxed.


Continue reading

What we are in the grips of: Joseph Wilson and Noam Chomsky

As I react with incredulity at the conduct of this administration, there is so much to rail against that I, along with many others, have cut back o­n scrutinizing all the accounts. As someone who has taken to passing information along, my alternative has been to say more about crop circles, which are a source of potential breakthrough, than to keep wallowing in political breakdown. But sometimes I come across something so compelling that instead of speed reading it I slow down to take in every word. The latest thing I've ingested this way is an excerpt from Joseph Wilson's new book, The Politics of Truth, that was posted o­n the Truthout.com website a couple of days ago.

I'm not going to excerpt it here so that you don't get a few bites and think you've had enough. For a penetrating exposé, The Cult That's Running the Country: Joseph Wilson blasts the secretive neoconservative cabal that plunged America into a disastrous war, do read it all.

I did skim over parts of a long and “very enlightening interview with [Noam] Chomsky,” which listmember Ed Herman sent out. If you find more things for me to post in the whole piece, send them along, but here's the end, that I've found myself chewing over, of what Chomsky said o­n April 24th:

I mean sooner or later terror and weapons of mass destruction are going to get together, it’s just a matter of time. This reflects an extremely broad consensus among analysts. There’s also a consensus o­n how to deal with terror, a strong consensus and it has two elements: there are the terrorists themselves and there is the potential reservoir of support and sympathy which they’re trying to mobilize. They regard themselves as the vanguard trying to mobilize support. The reservoir of sympathy may be people who hate them and fear them and hate what they do but nevertheless recognize that there is some justice in their cause. So how do you deal with the two groups? Well the terrorists, you deal with them as with other criminal actions, through police actions, which turns out to be have been quite successful. There has been considerable success in finding leaders, in trying them and breaking up the financing networks.

What about the potential reservoir? Well o­n that again there is strong agreement. What you have to do is ask them what their grievances are. They have grievances, many of them are quite legitimate, so you address those legitimate grievances. I mean that should be done apart from the threat of terror, but just focusing o­n terror, if you address the legitimate grievances that will reduce the ability of the vanguard to mobilize support because it’s based o­n grievances.

On the other hand if you want to help the terrorist then just use violence because that will antagonize and infuriate the reservoir. It will increase recruitment to the terrorist groups, so we have a choice. Either can reduce the threat of terror or we can increase it. This administration and Blair are consciously acting to increase it.

Blair is particularly interesting because the British have just been through this in Northern Ireland. As long as they reacted to IRA terror by increasing violence they stimulated it. As soon as they began, for the first time, to pay some attention to the grievances they were able to reduce it. In fact Belfast is not paradise but it is a lot better than it was ten years ago

As far as I know, every former head of Israeli Military Intelligence and of the general security services has said the same thing: that is if you want to fight terror with violence then you’re asking for an unwinnable war. If you give the people some respect and pay attention to their grievances then you can reach an accommodation, that’s been very generally true.

There’s o­nly o­ne way in which violence works and that’s through extermination, then it works. So take, say, the United States, the United States does not have a lot of internal conflicts and it has a single language over a huge territory and why? It exterminated the native population. If you do that you don’t have any problems, but anything that falls short of extermination or mass expulsion then it’s going to escalate a cycle of violence. It’s always terrible but by now it has become lethal to survival because of our capacity for destruction.


Continue reading