Category Archives: World Press

World Press

Polishing the Kucinich Star

I was looking o­n the Net for a particular Dennis Kucinich speech that shows how spiritually minded he is, when I came across something in his Martin Luther King Day speech that echoes what I wrote in COULD WE SPARK A CAMPAIGN?. After I saw the movie, 8 Mile, what I wrote about came from thinking the country could not sustain with pockets that are as abysmal as the o­ne in Detroit — and that cleaning up our pockets could be a tipping point to cleaning up the world and making us a species that can live together in peace. What I wrote was through a lens of altruism, where the rich need to take poverty o­n. Kucinich suggested it be addressed from the even deeper perspective of human rights. He said:

Once again the hopes of people of two nations are being smashed by weapons in the name of eliminating weapons. Let us abolish weapons of mass destruction at home. Joblessness is a weapon of mass destruction. Poverty is a weapon of mass destruction. Hunger is a weapon of mass destruction. Homelessness is a weapon of mass destruction. Poor health care is a weapon of mass destruction. Poor education is a weapon of mass destruction. Discrimination is a weapon of mass destruction.Let us abolish such weapons of mass destruction here at home.

Let us use hundreds of billions of our tax dollars, which some would cast upon Iraq in bombs and warring troops, instead for the restoration of the American Dream, to rebuild our economy and to expand opportunities for all. We have a duty to assert our human needs as a people and not to yield them for the base concerns of an unresponsive government: We have a right to a job. We have a right to decent housing. We have a right to health care. We have a right to food fit to eat, air fit to breathe and water fit to drink. Peace is a civil right which makes other human rights possible. Peace is the precondition for our existence. Peace permits our continued existence.

The Kucinich speech I actually was looking for is “Spirit and Stardust,” from the middle of last year. I guarantee that you never have read a speech from any politician that has the depth and breadth of this o­ne.  Have you ever heard a politician say anything like this?

We need to remember where we came from; to know that we are o­ne. To understand that we are of an undivided whole: race, color, nationality, creed, gender are beams of light, refracted through o­ne great prism. We begin as perfect and journey through life to become more perfect in the singularity of “I” and in the multiplicity of “we”; a more perfect union of matter and spirit.

The media are treating the Kucinich candidacy as if he has no chance to win. I wonder. That Paul Ray survey a few years ago, that most of my readers will be familiar with, made big noise telling us there were enough “Cultural Creatives” in the United States to elect a president. Could Kucinich, who figures to get all the votes of such people, succeed out of who he is and not what he spends to sell himself? Maybe he's got his candidacy sewed up already, and doesn't have to waste his energy fundraising. It would be interesting if o­ne of the big progressive websites opened a voting opportunity for us, where the objective was to count votes of people already sold — with an honor system not to vote more than o­nce, so an assessment useful to the campaign might be made.

PS: If you have a big bill o­n your dial-1 long distance phone service, home or business, or have a T-1 for business, I'd like to save you money. For about 8 years, my non-profit, Mighty Companions, has been selling long distance for a company that gives ten times more than Working Assets to the non-profit sector. Good people, great service. Click here for info and sign-up.

Comments? Click here
Continue reading

The Dirt on Dennis Not…

A stream of particularly excoriating emails about Dennis Kucinich, from o­ne Joe Bialek, has been making the email rounds to try to knock him out of the presidential box. I've gotten them not o­nly in group emails, but to me, personally. This guy is looking for where Kucinich's name shows up — see “Kucinich Rocks the Boat” o­n my site — to send hate mail. It was disturbing enough for me to check its veracity, in case this was true:

“This is the man, the mayor, who brought Cleveland to its knees financially…Maybe even worse, he was blamed for cementing the city's place as a national joke: The Mistake by the Lake, they called this city. Things were so bad that when he threw out the first pitch for the Cleveland Indians o­n Opening Day 1978, Mayor Kucinich wore a bulletproof jacket…Kucinich's political and fiscal crisis came in 1978 when local banks refused to refinance $15 million in short-term city debt they had routinely rolled over previously. The loans were unrelated to the electric utility, then called Muny Light. But bankers demanded its sale to the local private utility company as the price for refinancing. Kucinich refused, and the city technically defaulted when the notes expired. Voters later approved a tax increase to keep the utility and bail out the city. But Kucinich was crushed politically and personally.”

Here's the story Bialek doesn't tell.  From “Who's the Real Peace Candidate?” LA Weekly Doug Ireland

He used to be known as the Boy Wonder of Ohio politics: Cleveland city councilman at 23, mayor at 31. Kucinich inherited a city teetering o­n the edge of bankruptcy, and governed as a populist against the vested interests. Cleveland had (and, thanks to Kucinich, still has) a city-owned power plant delivering electricity at up to 60 percent cheaper than its private-sector twin. This upset Cleveland’s bankers, who had deep ties to Muny Light’s competitor, and they blackmailed Kucinich: Either sell Muny Light to pay the city’s debts, or we’ll pull Cleveland’s credit. Kucinich refused to give in, the banks canceled the city’s credit, and Cleveland was in default. Local media nicknamed the mayor “Dennis the Menace” and crusaded against him, and Kucinich was speedily ousted. For the next 15 years, Kucinich was in the political wilderness and out of office.

In 1994, a scandal plaguing a state senator created an opening for Kucinich, who took it. Two years later, Dennis the Menace snatched a seat in Congress. Now, “the passage of time has shown that Kucinich may have been more right than he was wrong,” acknowledges veteran political columnist and editorial-page director Brent Larkin of Kucinich’s hometown paper, the Cleveland Plain Dealer.

A couple of years ago, the Cleveland City Council passed a resolution thanking Kucinich for his “courage and foresight” in refusing to sell Muny Light. Cleveland area voters are so fond of Kucinich that Ohio Republicans — who detest him — didn’t even bother trying to gerrymander Kucinich out of his seat in last year’s congressional redistricting. “Kucinich is probably the most popular officeholder in Cuyahoga County,” Larkin says.

I want to tag o­n something else that came in my email, sent by Yvonne Garcia, which has the same kind of off the charts high-mindedness that Kucinich expresses:

  

WAR CAN NO LONGER BE AN INSTRUMENT OF NATIONAL POLITICS

With the Statement “War: A Crime Against Humanity” the Club of Budapest is launching a debate o­n the right of national states to declare and wage war as a means of settling issues of foreign policy. “Times are over when questions of war and peace could be decided in the context of international power politics,” says Ervin Laszlo, President of the Club of Budapest, a global think-and-action tank with a hundred members including the Dalai Lama, Mikhail Gorbachev, Archbishop Tutu, Elie Wiesel, Peter Ustinov and others. “Right cannot be decided by might, in the international field any more than in the personal domain. In an interdependent global community every war between nations is fundamentally a civil war.” Terrorists and potential aggressors must be stopped, but war is not the way to stop them. Warfare must be replaced by dialogue leading to mutual understanding as a basis of multilateral cooperation in regard to relations among nations in the political as well as in the economic and the ecological spheres.

According to the Club of Budapest, the project of creating a structure of global cooperation beyond the veto-power and special status of individual states is best pursued in the framework of a “World Futures Council” as proposed among others by Mikhail Gorbachev and Jacob von Uexkuell. The Council is to be constituted of o­ne hundred independent individuals of high integrity who place the shared human interest above any parochial national or cultural interest. The Club of Budapest takes an active part in the creation of such a Council and will promote its work with special attention to questions of civil and political values and perceptions, and the humanism and sustainability of the policies motivated by them.

———

The following Statement is signed by Members of the Club of Budapest inter alia Sir Peter Ustinov, Paolo Coelho, Pir Inayat-Vilayat Khan, Zubin Mehta, Betty Williams, Hans Küng, Sir Sigmund Sternberg, Jane Goodall, Peter Russell, Vigdis Finnbogadottir, and Lady Fiona Montagu.

WAR: A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

The time has come for the world community to recognize that war, rather than an instrument for the elimination of terrorists and aggressors, is a crime against humanity. It is itself an act of aggression that threatens human life, and the environment o­n which human life vitally depends.

No other species kills massively its own kind: war is a uniquely human phenomenon. Such killing was never justified, but it had a marginal warrant at a time when war was waged among neighboring groups for the acquisition of territory with natural and human resources and could be limited to the territories and the warriors of the protagonists. At a time when resources are not limited to defined territories and hostilities cannot be contained, war is neither politically nor economically justified. Given that modern warfare kills innocent civilians, inflicts serious damage o­n the life-supporting environment, and may escalate to a global conflagration, waging war needs to be declared a crime against humanity. No nation-state should have the legitimate right to wage war against any other nation-state.

The stockpiling of weapons of mass destruction is not a warrant for waging war. Weapons of mass destruction whether they are nuclear, chemical, biological, or conventional are a threat to human life and habitat by whoever possesses them. They are not tolerable in the hands of any state, whether it is large or small, rich or poor, and headed by a dictator or by an elected politician. Such weapons need to be eliminated from the arsenals of every state, a task that is not the self-declared prerogative of any government but the responsibility of the global community of all peoples and states. There will be no lasting peace o­n earth until all weapons of mass destruction are destroyed, their production and stockpiling proscribed, and strategies calling for their use replaced by strategies of dialogue, negotiation and, if necessary, internationally agreed economic and political sanctions.

Attempting to eliminate weapons of mass destruction with weapons of mass destruction is to fight violence with violence o­n the principle of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, a policy that can end up making everyone blind and toothless. Aggressors and terrorists must be stopped, but war is not the way to stop them.

———————————–

The Club of Budapest is an informal association of creative people in diverse fields of art, literature, and the spiritual domains of culture. It is dedicated to the proposition that o­nly by changing ourselves we can change the world – and that to change ourselves we need the kind of insight and perception that art, literature, and the domains of the spirit can best provide. The members of the Club of Budapest use their artistic creativity and spiritual insight to enhance awareness of global problems and human opportunities. They communicate their insights in word and image, in sound and motion, and in the myriad new media and technologies. They are recognized world leaders in their fields of literary, artistic, or spiritual activity; their names are assurance of insight, and their membership in the club a testimony of their dedication to our common future.”  –Ervin Laszlo

 Comments? Click here
Continue reading

Jacob Levich paints the picture of American Empire

Jacob Levich wrote a piece, Yes, Tony, There is a Conspiracy – New Iraq Report, about a report that he had a hand in producing, that documents the shocking long range plan of this administration.

Jake came o­n our list when TheConversation posted something he wrote that was circulating widely o­n the Net after Bush addressed Congress, post 9/11: Bush's Orwellian Address – Happy New Year: It's 1984. A sentence: “The defining speech of Bush's presidency points toward an Orwellian future of endless war, expedient lies, and ubiquitous social control.”

This new piece, which Jake wrote a couple of weeks ago, chillingly fleshes out what that first o­ne pointed to. However, it makes a  statement that was so shocking that I wondered about not seeing it anywhere else. Also, it was part of a larger picture, of “American Empire,” that  the conspiracy theorists were promoting but seemed to me most likely untrue.  Here's Jake's paragraph that I had doubts about:

Sen. Richard Lugar, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, quietly passed word to Russia and France that their countries will be frozen out of staggeringly lucrative postwar oil contracts unless they roll over and endorse the US attack.

If this were true, surely everyone would be up in arms over it, yet no more about it ever turned up. But, the piece scratched at me, especially as more stories about a U.S. master plan started coming from sources I respect — before Frontline put the seal o­n it this week (see below).  So, I went o­n the Net and searched. That Lugar item is out there — not in the American press, and o­nly o­n a couple of websites, but it was in the London ObserverUS buys up Iraqi oil to stave off crisis:

Richard Lugar, the hawkish chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, suggests reluctant Europeans risk losing out o­n oil contracts. 'The case he had made is that the Russians and the French, if they want to have a share in the oil operations or concessions or whatever afterward, they need to be involved in the effort to depose Saddam as well,' said Lugar's spokesman.

Why aren't we arresting the United States for criminal behavior? Why doesn't anybody with the power to help remove Bush from office point to the nakedness of our emperor? Is it OK to threaten countries with economic ruin to get them to behave in ways we want? Add a question about buying our way into Turkey with money that's going to causes we find unsupportable. “We've pretty much already agreed to allow tens of thousands of Turkish troops to march into Iraqi Kurdistan to ruthlessly put down any Kurdish nationalism,” is what they said o­n warblogging.com. This is not to mention Turkey's negotiating for enough money for reconstruction up front because Afghanistan was abandoned by us and Turkey doesn't want the same fate. But, wait a minute, this bargain is being struck in the face of  us being about to participate in devastation being wreaked o­n Turkey. I don't know, maybe it's cause I'm a girl, but this calm process of guaranteeing rebuilding for what we are about to level doesn't rest easy in my psyche. I want all the money that's being spent o­n warring to go to making this a better world.

Quotes from Jake's Iraq piece:

Yes, Tony, there is a conspiracy, in the dictionary sense of the term: an agreement among people to perform a criminal or wrongful act. It consists not of a tiny cabal, but of the whole of the American power elite, from politicians to business executives to journalists…

Behind the Invasion of Iraq, the startling new book-length report authored by the Research Unit for Political Economy (RUPE), synthesizes the seemingly disparate threads of the US war drive in what amounts to a blistering indictment of American foreign policy. The report is lavishly documented and jargon-free; the effect, especially for readers with limited understanding of global commerce and finance, is of puzzle pieces clicking decisively into place.

The RUPE report wholly confirms the widely-held view of the coming war as a massive oil grab, “on a scale not witnessed since the days of colonialism.” Further, the current debate about arms inspections and alleged links to al-Qaeda is revealed as pure political theater, since the decision to invade Iraq was made months ago…

The US invasion of Iraq needs to be understood not as an end in itself but as the means to an end — the foundation of a New American Empire.

Listmember Rick Ingrasci [rick@bigmindmedia.com] sent this:

Subject: Frontline tells it like it is…

Dear Friends,

If you didn't catch Frontline o­n PBS — a show entitled “The War Behind Closed Doors” — you might want to check it out o­nline at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/iraq/.

A taste:

As the U.S. stands at the brink of possible war with Iraq, many are now warning about the potential consequences: the danger of getting bogged down in Baghdad, the prospect of longtime allies leaving America's side, the possibility of chaos in the Middle East, the threat of renewed terrorism.

But the Bush administration insiders who helped define the “Bush Doctrine,” and who have argued most forcefully for war, are determined to set a course that will remake America's role in the world. Having served three Republican presidents over the course of two decades, this group of close advisers — among them Vice President Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and perhaps most importantly, Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz — believe that the removal of Saddam Hussein is the necessary first act of a new era.

In “The War Behind Closed Doors,” FRONTLINE traces the inside story of how that group of advisers — calling themselves “neo-Reaganites,” “neo-conservatives,” or simply “hawks” — set out to achieve the most dramatic change in American foreign policy in half a century: a grand strategy, formally articulated in the National Security Strategy released last September, that is based o­n preemption rather than containment and calls for the bold assertion of American power and influence around the world.

Comments? Click here